Society should identify those children who have special talents and provide training for them at an early age to develop their talents.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Some children have prodigious talent from their early age; their acts or behavior can help to notice their talents. But, it is difficult to discern the talent of the children in their early age. The above assertion to identify the children who have prodigies from their rare age and provide them training is nowhere agreeable to me. The society if follows will lead to more vulnerable tact being cynical because the society’s contrivance to subsume only the talented children will be biased for the rest children.
First and foremost, society is the backbone for the children to shape up them. Their behaviors, tact, how to communicate with other, to enhance their skill and so forth are somehow the responsibilities of the society. The society being such foundation for the children should rather support every children and involve them in the training to develop talents. For instance, if the society only include the consummate children then that is no worth for the welfare. The guidance is needed more for those who lack it. The society if includes all the children will help in the prosperity of the society. The society needs to think of large group rather than of the part.
Secondly, confining only certain group will leads to create dispute between the otherwise groups. The society is likely to seem biased for the other children who are not on-born talented and not included in the talent development program. This will in turn, be more vulnerable, which are thought to be efficacious. For instance, if we praise a children of their wise behavior in front of other children who are less wise than him, he will think that we are against him. This serves to depict that the equal consideration for every children should be provided in the society. Since, child age is the learning process and to agree not everyone is genius, society should shed the light equally for the learning children.
However, the societies contrivance of the identifying the prodigal child is not that easy to screen in the early age. Childs at early age are in nascent phase. They are in the learning process of the life, everything for them seem to be new, so judging them about their talents in such stage is implausible, which would not provide intended result. Furthermore, the society should account on how to develop every child with the training or programs, which can only lead to further develop them skills. Afterwards only, teaching them effectively, what behavior they show will help to adjudicate the issue to screen the talent of the children.
To sum up, the society being fundamental towards shaping up the children, rather they should first try to teach every children with the commensurate knowledge to develop skills, talent, to be efficacious or add the quality of deftness. Then only, the society can judge or identify the talents of the children. So, society not being cynical should provide the tantamount behavior in progressing or development of the all children.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 340, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'developing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'train' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: developing
...ildren and involve them in the training to develop talents. For instance, if the society o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 402, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...r instance, if the society only include the consummate children then that is no worth for the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 601, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... help in the prosperity of the society. The society needs to think of large group r...
^^^
Line 5, column 45, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ndly, confining only certain group will leads to create dispute between the otherwise...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 343, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a child' or simply 'children'?
Suggestion: a child; children
...efficacious. For instance, if we praise a children of their wise behavior in front of othe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 14, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'societies'' or 'society's'?
Suggestion: societies'; society's
... the learning children. However, the societies contrivance of the identifying the prod...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, then, for instance, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2495.0 2235.4752809 112% => OK
No of words: 499.0 442.535393258 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.72634191566 4.55969084622 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60312387539 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.430861723447 0.4932671777 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 759.6 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 11.0 4.99550561798 220% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.9919815078 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8 118.986275619 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.96 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.56 5.21951772744 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.368475637302 0.243740707755 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120420586214 0.0831039109588 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056001513477 0.0758088955206 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235252142051 0.150359130593 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0407409342665 0.0667264976115 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.33 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.