Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.
Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider the possible consequences of implementing the policy and explain how these consequences shape your position.
Eventhough, some people believe that efforts should be made to protect endagered species only if their extinction is resulted from human influence, I believe that there is a need to save all the endangered species irrespective of the cause of their extinction. I believe that every living organism on this earth has equal right to live and we as humans who are considered to be more superior than other animals should take actions to protect rest of the species.
All the living organisms have their own significance in maintaining eco balance in on this planet. By restricting our efforts to save only a subset of endangered species, we are ignoring the fact that some species might become completely extinct. This situation may have some negative impacts beyond human imagination. For instance, a particular type of plant is unique in a forest. This plant is very importnat to treat a critical disease. It is at risk due to pests. With increasing pest attack, plant has become exinct. Currethere is no other medicine for this particular disease. If such a situation occures then impacts of it might involve death of myriad of people. If we had taken care to protect such plats, then we have not only just saved the life of plant but, life of many people.
In addition to this, one cannot deny that a particular type of endangered species could be the source of food for many other species. So, eradication of such species will greatly afftect the lives of other animals dependant on it. This might cause a chain reaction which might involve death of many other living organisms.
There are many animals as well as plants which are on the verge of extinction. Humans may not be the direct cause for thier extinction. However, we can take some action to preotect thier lives. Because, once a plant or an animal disappears completely from this planet, there is no way to get it back. Dinosorous are the best examples of such a scenario. Now, one can only see it in movies and posters but, not in real life. If we do not take necessary actions in this regard, many oragnisms might become extinct and our next generation is going to face a great loss.
In summary, I would like to say that while protecting the animals which arein the process of exinction due to human activities, it is imprtant to pay attention to save other endangered species. By doing so we can save many lives.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 379, Rule ID: SUPERIOR_THAN[2]
Message: The adjective more is normally used with to and does not need 'more' (so called implicit comparative). Probably you need to write: 'superior to'.
Suggestion: superior to
...d we as humans who are considered to be more superior than other animals should take actions to pr...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 585, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...r medicine for this particular disease. If such a situation occures then impacts o...
^^
Line 6, column 215, Rule ID: DEPENDENT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'dependent' on?
Suggestion: dependent
...atly afftect the lives of other animals dependant on it. This might cause a chain reactio...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, while, for instance, in addition, in summary, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 12.9106741573 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1977.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 417.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.74100719424 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5189133491 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56891958999 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.489208633094 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 636.3 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 55.9307607672 60.3974514979 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.375 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 23.4991977007 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.95833333333 5.21951772744 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 5.13820224719 156% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161861070886 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0437348596632 0.0831039109588 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0516328121665 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103123982839 0.150359130593 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0378301712583 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 14.1392134831 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.58 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.