Some believe that local communities should rely on citizen volunteers for projects benefiting those communities (e.g., organizing youth sports leagues and collecting donations for charity). Others believe that local communities are better served when professional community leaders with the necessary skills and time instead handle such projects.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own
position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and
supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
When a controversial subject such as serving the local community projects come to a debate, some believe that these projects should be handled by volunteer citizen. However, others think that it’s better to have professional leaders for these projects. I agree that professional leaders with sufficient skill and time should serve the local community projects.
Admittedly, utilizing volunteer citizens who belong to a community in the local projects would inject motivation in them in order to utilize more the potential workforce. In fact, they take responsibilities to improve their own community, and put all of their efforts in solving the community issues. However, volunteer citizens have their own jobs from various fields. They cannot devote so much time to the local projects because they are busy with their own lives and duties. Therefore, volunteer citizens can be used for simpler projects that don’t require specific skills or devoting lots of time. For instance, running a fund raising by volunteer citizens for collecting the donations for charity would be a wise choice to utilizing local people’ energy and networking.
However, it should take into account that professionals are people who are educated and have sufficient skills. For serving each project either local or at a broader scope, professional leaders should be used. They have the necessary skills and time which volunteer citizens would not. Normally, each project needs adequate fund and great teamwork led by an adept leader to succeed. Volunteers citizens cannot guarantee the source of sufficient fund for their local projects while professional leaders can use their networks and abilities to convince the government to allocate fund for the local projects. Also, they have necessary time to persistently continue the projects until their success. Therefore, professional leaders with great leadership skills should serve each project, even for the local community projects.
Moreover, volunteer citizens might consider their personal benefits or interests in leading the local projects and do not consider the well-being of the whole community. Therefore, an objective leader that is professionally educated is a better choice for handling the local projects. For example, consider the local youth sports leagues. If parents of the community’s youth are volunteers to organizing the leagues, it’s likely that they just think about their own child and not the whole community’s youths. They may oblige the trainers to utilize their child in their sports team. Hence, an unbiased professional leader will be fairer for the whole community.
In conclusion, professional leaders with the necessary time and skills are better for serving the local community projects than the volunteer citizens. Nonetheless, it would be wise that the professional leaders utilize the potential local people for some projects.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, may, moreover, nonetheless, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 19.5258426966 72% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 58.6224719101 65% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2468.0 2235.4752809 110% => OK
No of words: 444.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55855855856 5.05705443957 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.5903493882 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80300009137 2.79657885939 100% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.439189189189 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 749.7 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4818400695 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.833333333 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.83333333333 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.404731703118 0.243740707755 166% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135598422716 0.0831039109588 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0927555688766 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278537963604 0.150359130593 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0540038238113 0.0667264976115 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 14.1392134831 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.1639044944 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 100.480337079 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.