Some people argue that successful leaders in government, industry, or other fields must be highly competitive. Other people claim that in order to be successful, a leader must be willing and able to cooperate with others.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
There are some people who believe that leaders have to be highly competitive in order to be successful in their career, however, i believe that cooperation is much more conducive to success. Cooperation increases the common sense in a community and augments the progress of an organization.
First of all, by cooperation all of the members of the organization will have the same goal. In order to fulfil their goals, everyone tries to show the best effort as well as pushing the others members forward to accelerate making their dreams real. Taking a sports team for instance, the team members galvanize each other to beat the other team and they find and point out the drawbacks of the other members and help them to resolve them. On the contrary, in competitions there are no mutual goals and everyone wants their own progress and one of the key points is to let the opponent to fail which will increase the selfishness in the community.
In addition, competitions usually raise envy among people which will stymie a favorable and happy work flow. Cooperation, however, ends up in not only a joyful experience, it also leads to the improvement of the skills of the individuals and mitigates the amount of stress which people face while working in companies. Taking scholars for example, there are a myriad of students who encumbered lots of suffer because of the competition which their parents induced in them. If a classmate was ahead only one point, it would sometimes lead to the student disappointment and stress of facing their parents. By increasing a sense of cooperation, by decreasing stress the outcome of the effort will be more auspicious.
Although It in as undisputable fact that competitions enhance the effort of the individuals to have a better performance than other people, but especially in leaders if they don’t have the common sense, they only increase the distance between themselves and others. Through a good relationship between leaders and people, the trust of the people will be augmented and they won’t know the leader as someone different to them. By cooperation They will know the leader as a help to accomplish their mutual goals instead of believing that they are means for the leader to progress.
In conclusion, cooperation has a telling effect on the development of an organization. It enhances the abilities of the workers and trust among them beside correcting the disadvantages of the individuals and establishing a blissful relationship between the leader and the workers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 130, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...be successful in their career, however, i believe that cooperation is much more c...
^
Line 1, column 291, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ugments the progress of an organization. First of all, by cooperation all of the ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 30, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...zation. First of all, by cooperation all of the members of the organization will have t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...aking scholars for example, there are a myriad of students who encumbered lots of suff...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...between themselves and others. Through a good relationship between leaders and pe...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2126.0 2235.4752809 95% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08612440191 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93601008449 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.485645933014 0.4932671777 98% => OK
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1790717389 60.3974514979 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.733333333 118.986275619 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8666666667 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244136362159 0.243740707755 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.081367000154 0.0831039109588 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0753038291767 0.0758088955206 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138453255657 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0773085834853 0.0667264976115 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 14.1392134831 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.1639044944 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.