Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field Write

Essay topics:

Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Choosing a study field in a major concern for a college student as they is a conflict among own interest and talent vs availability of the job field. Here I am going to support the own enthusiasm and talent over high paid job because of two reasons which I am going to describe.

A combination of talents and enthusiasm can make a student more focused for his/her work in future and reverse case also works. For instance, A college student who is passionate about art and have a good talents, chose chemical engineering for having a good job perspective in future. But this eventually lead him to ultimate frustration, where he will not get the enjoyment as being an artist, consequently his/her result will express his shortcomings. This eventually make him contempt for securing a good job. Therefore, the reason behind choosing a subject will shatter the reason itself. On the contrary, if he has chose the art or art related subjects for his field of study, he could make a greater impact on the field by doing extra-ordinary effort. This may results in less earning, but he/she will be mentally satisfied with his work.

Another thing is "availability of jobs" in a certain field is not a constant term and it may changes with time. Once lucrative job opportunities can be seemed cliché after some years. For example, telecommunication engineering got a huge response when different mobile operator companies where flourishing. But after some years, the job market in this sector got saturated. As job availability is not a predictable term, therefore a college student should not only rely on this factor over his talents and passion.

At the same time, it is true that, a college student may not understand his/her capability of doing a work at that time. Sometimes, people just have chose a job according to its face value, and also have made a great success on that job. In addition, a college student can hardly relate with the harsh reality and they will always choose some fancy major for their future which may not always be suitable for them.

So to conclude, a college student should highly prioritize his talents and passion for choosing a field rather than job availability .

Votes
Average: 5.8 (2 votes)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...r concern for a college student as they is a conflict among own interest and talen...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'talent'?
Suggestion: talent
...is passionate about art and have a good talents, chose chemical engineering for having ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ering for having a good job perspective in future. But this eventually lead him to ultima...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...ason itself. On the contrary, if he has chose the art or art related subjects for his...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... that time. Sometimes, people just have chose a job according to its face value, and ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing a field rather than job availability .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, another thing, for example, for instance, in addition, it is true, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86006043236 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0532223207 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294251918311 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965220627229 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108459777009 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206354171667 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842595792207 0.0667264976115 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 73, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'be'
Suggestion: be
...r concern for a college student as they is a conflict among own interest and talen...
^^
Line 3, column 205, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'talent'?
Suggestion: talent
...is passionate about art and have a good talents, chose chemical engineering for having ...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 275, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...ering for having a good job perspective in future. But this eventually lead him to ultima...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 621, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
...ason itself. On the contrary, if he has chose the art or art related subjects for his...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 150, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'chosen'.
Suggestion: chosen
... that time. Sometimes, people just have chose a job according to its face value, and ...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 133, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ing a field rather than job availability .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, therefore, thus, another thing, for example, for instance, in addition, it is true, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1840.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 375.0 442.535393258 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90666666667 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86006043236 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 215.323595506 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.77640449438 225% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.0532223207 60.3974514979 58% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 102.222222222 118.986275619 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61111111111 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294251918311 0.243740707755 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0965220627229 0.0831039109588 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.108459777009 0.0758088955206 143% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.206354171667 0.150359130593 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0842595792207 0.0667264976115 126% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 14.1392134831 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.21 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.