Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.Writ

Essay topics:

Some people believe that college students should consider only their own talents and interests when choosing a field of study. Others believe that college students should base their choice of a field of study on the availability of jobs in that field.

Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

Every investment is made with the objective to earn expected returns considering various risks involved in it and sometimes due to external shocks: sluggish economy, higher taxation, returns often not realised and investment turns sour. The choice of a field of study in a college follows the same principle as shown in US 2000 Career Research on jobs that stated: the student should decide to pursue those fields which may bring in higher returns in terms of job opportunities considering the costs and time involved in college education system worldwide. While, there is no doubt that pursuing a field as per the job market can be a relieving factor for a student under financial burden, there is a reason to believe that student’s own interest and skills can also buttress student’s financial health such as when a student pursues a field as per his own interest and skills, he is more likely to achieve pinnacle of his career, thus, can support himself financially as well.

However true it may be that student’s own skills and talents often help him to better exploit career opportunities in a field chosen according to the inherent skills. But the rising costs and time involved in college education drive the students to pursue a field which is not only lucrative but also has sustainable future. As per US 2000 Career Research on jobs, majority of students pursuing a higher degree in colleges have come from countries other than USA and 80 per cent of them were under heavy debt burden and thus, were trying to make ends meet by working part time and had a plan to pursue a field that was in demand among employers. For example, a case study on Harvard Business School conducted in 2005 that covered students who enrolled in different master courses shown that students have responded to a career choice question that personal interests and skills do not help to earn the livelihood for most of them and all of them have chosen to pursue what has been designed to secure a job in USA in order to pay back the debt. In brief, financial burden often comes in the way of chasing personal interests, thus, students are forced to choose a field as per job markets.

One argument that supports the idea that choosing personal interests can help students to live life sustainably and not be merely looking at present job opportunities is that job markets are fluctuating and unpredictable. Since what employers are seeking today among future employees may not be the same after few years thus, students who choose to pursue career oriented field may find themselves outdated or no longer relevant in few years’ time. This can be illustrated by the time when nuclear engineering was in high demand such as during the period between 1942 to 1949; countries were pushing universities to urge the students to pursue nuclear engineering in order to develop nuclear warheads due to rising hostilities. However, when non-proliferation treaty signed between nuclear powers, this career suddenly witnessed downfall and students were helplessly to join other jobs where skills of these nuclear engineers were not required, thus, were being paid at nominal rates. Thus, student should choose a field as per their skills since availability of jobs in one field is not certain and constant and even may not be available after sometime.

Finally, as behavioural scientists have shown that in 1995 that self-actualisation need of a college student is the most important in order to live long life that is stress free, enjoying and resourceful and it realised only when a student pursues a career as per his desire, ambition and skills. Since every job requires employees to work efficiently and to align their goals with the goals of organization, i.e., to be at top in terms of revenues and profits. Thus, organization goals encumber employees own gratification and put them under severe pressure of evaluation, thus render them anxious and unsatisfied and prevent them from enjoying the life. For example, in 2002 the study, conducted by a consultancy firm, covered 12000 employees working in different sectors in USA have shown that retention ratio is the lowest among employees who have pursued fields different from their skills and interests, thus, they keep on changing jobs in order to avoid year end evaluation and these employees are among the most unsatisfied with their employers and the fields they are working into, thus these career fields, though financially rewarding, but not helping the employees beyond certain time once they become financially independent and they intend to leave the job in order to pursue their dreams. Therefore, skills and talents help students to choose a field for a longer time period that would bring in prosperity, happiness and content in life.

While concluding, as can be seen from the above that, although it is true that financial burden often goads the students to choose fields as per the job markets, but due to the fickle job markets and unpredictable requirement of skills by employers, choosing a field which may not be in demand in future often results in sudden fall and demise. Moreover, the job satisfaction and personal achievements are very often not in harmony with the chosen field, thus the chosen field is likely to make them intellectually unproductive. Therefore, a college student is required to make a difficult choice between what is required today and in short span of time and long term self-actualisation.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 139, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to accord'.
Suggestion: to accord
... career opportunities in a field chosen according to the inherent skills. But the rising ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 573, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ere trying to make ends meet by working part time and had a plan to pursue a field that w...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 449, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
...ry often not in harmony with the chosen field, thus the chosen field is likely to mak...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 472, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to field'
Suggestion: to field
... with the chosen field, thus the chosen field is likely to make them intellectually u...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, however, if, look, may, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in brief, in short, no doubt, such as, it is true

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 39.0 19.5258426966 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 41.0 14.8657303371 276% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 29.0 11.3162921348 256% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 53.0 33.0505617978 160% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 128.0 58.6224719101 218% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 19.0 12.9106741573 147% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 4590.0 2235.4752809 205% => Less number of characters wanted.
No of words: 913.0 442.535393258 206% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0273822563 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.49689820348 4.55969084622 121% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77939262491 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 371.0 215.323595506 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.406352683461 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 1385.1 704.065955056 197% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.10617977528 290% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 43.0 23.0359550562 187% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 119.333314331 60.3974514979 198% => OK
Chars per sentence: 218.571428571 118.986275619 184% => OK
Words per sentence: 43.4761904762 23.4991977007 185% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 5.21951772744 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.83258426966 21% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352569323068 0.243740707755 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121239764115 0.0831039109588 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0771645506045 0.0758088955206 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220734770078 0.150359130593 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.043162550364 0.0667264976115 65% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 24.0 14.1392134831 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.29 48.8420337079 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 18.9 12.1743820225 155% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.78 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 180.0 100.480337079 179% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.0 11.8971910112 160% => OK
gunning_fog: 19.2 11.2143820225 171% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.7820224719 161% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.