Some people believe that corporations have a responsibility to promote the wellbeing of the societies and environments in which they operate. Others believe that the only responsibility of corporations, provided they operate within the law, is to make as much money as possible.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The topic raises a controversial issue of whether corporations need to promote well-being or need to make money as much as possible. In arguably, every corporation starts with the same short-term aim, to generate revenue as much as possible. However, from the perspective of a humanitarian society, everyone needs to contribute towards the process to make the life of common people better. Thus, I generally agree with the decision of corporations to prioritize well-being in the long run, in order to make the people happy, which, in turn, will help them increase their stature inside the society.
To begin with, making money might be a short-term motive for most of the associations when they are at their rudimentary stages. However, if the corporation keeps on thinking about growth in terms of financial stature, they are leaving behind the aesthetic aspect of the human being, is to help each other to grow. Making money is necessary to flourish in a short term, but in terms of long-term sustainability, one can’t just ignore the wellbeing of their surroundings.
Furthermore, creating and investing the excess revenue in the wellbeing of the society not only will skyrocket the deference towards the institution, they will also promote opportunities for branching of the original industry. Let’s illustrate this with the examples of the Ambani group in India. Initially, they had only the business related to oil import and export, but they had the prescience to invest in other branches like telecom industries, schools, universities and many more. By promoting welfare, they have created numerous job opportunities as well as increased their company’s stature in the society.
To sum it up, although making money should be one of the most crucial aspects of an industry, but they should not overlook the prospect of doing something back for the society. For short-term benefits, revenue is absolutely crucial for stability and sustenance of a corporation. But, the governing authorities should also prioritize about increasing or creating recreation, schools, hospitals etc. in their society in order to reach out to the common people.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, look, so, thus, well, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 19.5258426966 51% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 11.3162921348 9% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 60.0 58.6224719101 102% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1830.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 343.0 442.535393258 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33527696793 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01273268592 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553935860058 0.4932671777 112% => OK
syllable_count: 564.3 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.38483146067 205% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.2737746701 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.0 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.6 5.21951772744 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.13304926828 0.243740707755 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0451240450381 0.0831039109588 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388623752812 0.0758088955206 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0801685518177 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461887916459 0.0667264976115 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 14.1392134831 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.