Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment.
The prompt presents a complex issue of whether government officials should carry out the will of the people they serve or they should base their decisions on their own judgment. In my opinion, a government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. It should keep in mind the benefit of majority of the people without ignoring and isolating the needs for upliftment of the minorities. It is a tough spot to be in but it is what will engender growth and prosperity for a country.
Government's main agenda should be welfare of the citizen and the country, and with this idea a democratically elected goverment or other kinds of goverment should keep notice of the demands and needs of the people they are serving. This ensures justice by the people, builds trust among the people and the government and provides guidance to the government on how it can better serve the public. For instance, in India, the recent farm bill is a perfect example of government responding to the will of the farmers in India. The farmers have long complained about exploitation and unfair treatment by officials in the regulated 'mandi' market model that has existed for over 70 years. The ruling government at the moment has responded to that and introduced a free market for the farmers in an attempt to give them the power to set their own price. Another example, of government responding to the will of the people is death sentence of three rapists in the Nirbhaya Rape case, 2012. A gruesome rape case which shocked the entire country. The citizens took to streets to demand justice from the supreme court and recently responding to the what is right and the will of the people, the three rapists were sentenced to death. These couples of examples depict how when the government responds to the will of the people it is about providing them with better platform for their upliftment either in business or in morale. Afterall, human resource is the biggest resource a government has and it needs to build that trust with the citizens as well as provide them further resources that will in turn benefit the country in terms of increased prodcutivty and gross domestic product.
However, sometimes just considering the will of the people can be dangerous. As at times, it is possible that the what the will of the majority of people is in fact what is harmful for the country. To illustrate this, Babri-Masjid demolition case in India is a perfect example. Since 1991, people have been arguing to build a Ram temple where Babri Masjid stood as it is supposedly the birth place of Lord Ram. For decades, this issue has the fueled propoganda of Right wing party such as Bharitya Janta Party (BJP) who openely support hinduism and the ideology of hindutva. The party in its manifesto for 2014 elections promised to deliver Ram temple, and in 2020 it has delivered much to the cheer of the majority of citizens in India who follow Hinduism. However, this party has gone further in eradicting the existence of muslim people in the country through various amendments like the citizenship amendment act which very strategically, declares muslims as second class citizen. India, a secular nation is going through changes which both the party and majority people are cheering alongside but it deterimental for the muslim minortiy. This shows how sometimes just following the will of the majority feeds nothing but propoganda and in such situations the government officials should think for themselves and base their decisons on their own judgment without any selfish motive behind it.
In conclusion, governments should evaluate situations thoroughly and come to a decision using their judgment which serves the the people and increases their welfare. It should keep in consideration every citizen in the country and eventually do everything in their power to serve them humbly.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1418, Rule ID: AFTERALL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'after all'?
Suggestion: After all
...ftment either in business or in morale. Afterall, human resource is the biggest resource...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...ision using their judgment which serves the the people and increases their welfare. It ...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 123, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...ision using their judgment which serves the the people and increases their welfare. It ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, second, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 12.4196629213 177% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 44.0 33.0505617978 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 98.0 58.6224719101 167% => OK
Nominalization: 26.0 12.9106741573 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3219.0 2235.4752809 144% => OK
No of words: 653.0 442.535393258 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92955589587 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 5.05508305356 4.55969084622 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63061501611 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 294.0 215.323595506 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.450229709035 0.4932671777 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 983.7 704.065955056 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 10.0 4.99550561798 200% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.786361875 60.3974514979 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.76 118.986275619 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.12 23.4991977007 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.32 5.21951772744 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.380037605706 0.243740707755 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113189782325 0.0831039109588 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.137775909957 0.0758088955206 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293444351308 0.150359130593 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.144252058973 0.0667264976115 216% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 14.1392134831 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 146.0 100.480337079 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.