Some people believe it is imperative for individuals living in developed nations to reduce their energy consumption and lead a more sustainable lifestyle, given the evidence for global climate change. Others believe that such drastic lifestyle changes are unwarranted, based on the existing evidence for global climate change.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
Energy saving is one of the most important goal of the developed nations. But this goal can be acheived through collective efforts and not individual. The claim posits that some people believe it is important to save energy and lead a more sustainable lifestyle while others believe that these changes in lifestyle are unwarranted.
Be it valid or invalid, I mostly agree to the fact that reduction of energy consumption should be the primary goal of each and every citizen of the country. This position relies on few reasons as stated below.
First of all, increasing global warming is posing threat to every individual in one or the other way. Our future is unpredictable. Let's take a fictional example of a person who lives in well developed nation where electricity and other resources are easily available. If that partiicular person is asked to migrate to rural area, the sudden change in his/her urban lifestyle to bucolic one can be difficult to adapt. But while living in urban areas if he/she starts leading a sustainable lifestyle by eshewing use of cars or say televisions, it would be much easier for him/her to adjust to rural lifestyle where cars and televisions are hardly available.
Nations like UAE, are highly dependent on non-renewable resources like petrol and diesel for mode of transportation to work or school. These nations are highly ignorant to the fact that these non-renewable resources has an end, one day there would be no source of fossil fuels left. It would be quite difficult to sustain in countries like UAE where there is no petrol or diesel left. Some may argue that the need to save petrol is ephemeral and companies are working constantly on development of electric cars. They are also true on their side but that does not imply the fact of lavish use of non-renewable resources like petrol or diesel.
Energy is crucial to lead a convinenient lifestyle. We may stop unnecessary use of energy and try to save as much as we can. Global climate has become volatile and unstable. Anything can happen any moment. We ought to be prepared to face challenges where we are left with no energy and we are solely dependent on human intellectual to tackle those challenges. In essence, I agree with the statement as long as it not taken to extremes.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: LETS_LET[1]
Message: Did you mean 'Let's'?
Suggestion: Let's
...other way. Our future is unpredictable. Lets take a fictional example of a person wh...
^^^^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...e is no petrol or diesel left. Some may argue that the need to save petrol is ephemer...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, so, well, while, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 14.8657303371 128% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1893.0 2235.4752809 85% => OK
No of words: 391.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.84143222506 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44676510885 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75210592729 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521739130435 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 704.065955056 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 52.9136549038 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.1428571429 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.619047619 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.66666666667 5.21951772744 51% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25242598744 0.243740707755 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0624415509624 0.0831039109588 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0893681093622 0.0758088955206 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129739778918 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102486860245 0.0667264976115 154% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.7 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.79 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 100.480337079 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.