Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
An effective leader is one who adheres to his/her principles and objectives even in the times when they disagrees with the public. However, in the realms of our discussion, we cannot overlook scenarios where yielding to the public is beneficial.
First, every person has his/her own principles and mores. It is these ethics that define and identify a leader.
If a person doesn't adhere to what he/she beleives in, then the identity of the person is jeoparized. The people
should look upto a leader who can guide them in the right direction for the properity of the society. If the objectives
of the public and the leader are the same, then there will be no friction between the leader and the public. What if the motives of the public and the leader are not aligned in the same direction? What if the pulbic is wrong and the leader should succumb to the will of the public? Only an effective leader who strongly adheres to what he/she beleives can convince the public that what they beleive is wrong and can steer them in the right direction.
Second, do you give your 100% to acheive something that you don't beleive in? The answer is definitely no. Only when a person strongly beleives in what he/she does will they surpass unsurmountable heights. In politics, a person will have to sacrifice everything - time, money, and even family. A person will oblige to sacrifice everything only when he/she truely beleives in the cause they fight for. If the leader does not believe in what he/she is fighting for and is only doing so to please the mob, it is very highly unlikely that they leader will acheive anything substantial. The public will look upto the leader as a saviour. Both the public and the leader will have to settle for subliminimal outcome when the leader does not beleive in what he/she fights for.
Having said that, there can be scenarios where the objectives of the public and the leader may not be aligned in the same direction. For example, one of the local body representatives in my village planned to place a total lockdown to contain the spread of an epidemic in the village. But the public was not willing to oblige to the mandate as most of them live on daily wages and the lockdown was affecting their livelihood. The President had no other choice but to relax the lockdown rules so that the poor could mitigate their hardships.
To sum up, I personally beleive that for someone to be an effective leader, he/she should strongly adhere to what they beleive in as it is these ethics that define a person and will prod them to acheive something that is truely remarkable for the people to whom they intend to server.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 105, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'disagree'
Suggestion: disagree
... objectives even in the times when they disagrees with the public. However, in the realms...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 13, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...ine and identify a leader. If a person doesnt adhere to what he/she beleives in, then...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 61, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...your 100% to acheive something that you dont beleive in? The answer is definitely no...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, look, may, second, so, then, for example, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 19.0 11.3162921348 168% => OK
Pronoun: 52.0 33.0505617978 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 51.0 58.6224719101 87% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2191.0 2235.4752809 98% => OK
No of words: 467.0 442.535393258 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69164882227 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64867537961 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44907498031 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 215.323595506 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41113490364 0.4932671777 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.9971643839 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.2608695652 118.986275619 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3043478261 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30434782609 5.21951772744 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.97078651685 161% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226861671498 0.243740707755 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766612384453 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0599363691037 0.0758088955206 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112685904473 0.150359130593 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0513746234104 0.0667264976115 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 14.1392134831 76% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 48.8420337079 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.92 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.3 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 100.480337079 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum six paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.