Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
This topic raises a controversial issue of whether poitical leaders must yield to public opinion and forbid the principle for the sake of adjusting or to stick with the principles and objectives in order to be a effective leader. This depends on person to person as per their thinking, what could be done for the sake of betterment? In my opinion, I partially agree with the statement because the decisions made are purely based on the condition and one leader must act acccodingly to the situation. To bolster this, I would like to present some reasons with examples in the following easy below.
First of all, I would like to point that decision making are purely conditional and one should take decision for the best result. Let us consider an example of my village where in the leader of the village so called 'Serpanch' makes all the decisions of the village. We had drought in the year 2015. Growing crops that year was difficult given that the parameters required for crops wasn't fulfilled. So the villagers found a solution of getting water from the near by dam present to irrigate the crops. 'Serpanch' said even though it is not feasible to get water from the dam as the dam was build for generating electricity. But, if the 'serpanch' had not consider thier call many lives would have been endangered. Going against the government rules, the serpanch had to provide the water from the dam to save many lives of the villagers.
Secondly, consider if the 'Serpanch' had not approved the appeal made by the villagers many poeple of the village would have to suffer due to lack of food and may also have died. If the 'Serpanch' had not gone against the rule of government many lives would have been in danger. In this case, the 'Serpanch' made the proper decision which benefited all and showed a good quality of leaderships considering public opinion. Both common sense and personal experience have told us the effective leader not only follow rules but also benefits the people. Hence, all the evidence above demonstrate that following rule is important and so is the opinion of the people.
In conclusion, decision made are purely biased as per the requiremet, where sometimes you have to ignore the principles and rule for the benefits of everyone. This does not means one should take advantage and break rule and play evil for false reasons. As long as some measurement are performed leaders can stick to following particular principles and objectives while keeping the public opinion in mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 211, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rinciples and objectives in order to be a effective leader. This depends on perso...
^
Line 3, column 382, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wasn't
... that the parameters required for crops wasnt fulfilled. So the villagers found a sol...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 459, Rule ID: NEAR_BY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'nearby'?
Suggestion: nearby
...nd a solution of getting water from the near by dam present to irrigate the crops. Serp...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 520, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o irrigate the crops. Serpanch said even though it is not feasible to get water f...
^^
Line 3, column 652, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'considered'.
Suggestion: considered
...ectricity. But, if the serpanch had not consider thier call many lives would have been e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 667, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (thier) must be used with a third-person verb: 'calls'.
Suggestion: calls
... if the serpanch had not consider thier call many lives would have been endangered. ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 178, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...to lack of food and may also have died. If the Serpanch had not gone against the r...
^^
Line 6, column 174, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'mean'
Suggestion: mean
...the benefits of everyone. This does not means one should take advantage and break rul...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 12.4196629213 97% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 20.0 33.0505617978 61% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2071.0 2235.4752809 93% => OK
No of words: 430.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.81627906977 5.05705443957 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55372829156 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.54017902215 2.79657885939 91% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 215.323595506 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.493023255814 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 659.7 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9066410513 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.55 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.21951772744 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 7.80617977528 102% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.181737817305 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0539184880858 0.0831039109588 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0791116153254 0.0758088955206 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124780472709 0.150359130593 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0873770529301 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 12.1639044944 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.8 8.38706741573 93% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 100.480337079 85% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 62.5 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.75 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.