Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
<a href="https://www.dictionary.com/browse/candidness" ping="/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=https://www.dictionary.com/browse/candidness&ved=2ahUKEwi44ZDyqovgAhWkG…; style="color: rgb(102, 0, 153); cursor: pointer; text-decoration-line: underline; font-family: arial, sans-serif; font-size: small; white-space: normal; background-color: rgb(255, 255, 255);"><h3 class="LC20lb" style="font-size: 18px; font-weight: normal; margin: 0px; padding: 0px; display: inline-block;">Candidness</h3></a> and prudence are an inherent part of politicians, if one politician is not prudent towards his beliefs and objectives, he or she can be successful for a transient period of time but for long success a politician should be resolute and fervor towards ethics and goals.
Although, fabricated talk to the public can lead to a short-lived success but for a long term goal and effectiveness one must be honest enough. Otherwise, once the real truth comes out public start loathing those politicians. For example, in India, many politicians were once the paragon of Indian politics, but when the truth came out that they were involved in some corruption, people stopped trusting them. Eventually, those politicians were convicted and their influence on people have been gone forever.
Moreover, if we take a look towards a candid and prudent politician due to his honesty and prudence, he will be revered forever. Such kind of politicians will have a permanent impact on the public. For example, India's former prime minister Mr. Lalbahadur Shatri was very resolute towards his beliefs and objectives. He always cared about the national benefits, and for the sake of success, he never tried to beguile the public. Even during the recession, he decided to keep fast for once in a week and same he asked to do to the people of India so that resources could be saved. Although this idea was not like by the public initially, people started seeing the positive impact of this idea and started keeping fast. So clearly if a politician is consistent and fervid towards his beliefs, he'll be very effective.
Last but not least, for the sake of national security and public security a politician should be adamant to the external forces. For example, a politician shouldn't be thwarted by external pressures and also should be determined to fight against the invasion or against detrimental forces like terrorism. For which a politician needs to be determined, as many countries have been able to preclude the terrorism only because their politicians were untangled by those factors.
However, it's not completely true that politicians must be committed, as sometimes to soothe public outrage and to climb the political stairs a politician needs to hide some information which are not detrimental for the society and nation and that obscurity of truth could be helpful to politician's success.
So it's clear from above citations that, if a politician is honest, trustworthy, and determined, he/she will be long regarded and public will have long lived reverence towards him or her.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 731, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...r she can be successful for a transient period of time but for long success a politician shoul...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 791, Rule ID: HELL[1]
Message: Did you mean 'he'll'?
Suggestion: he'll
...sistent and fervid towards his beliefs, hell be very effective. Last but not leas...
^^^^
Line 7, column 156, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
...ernal forces. For example, a politician shouldnt be thwarted by external pressures and a...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...untangled by those factors. However, its not completely true that politicians mu...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, as for, for example, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 26.0 19.5258426966 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 27.0 14.8657303371 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 58.6224719101 72% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2693.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 457.0 442.535393258 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.89277899344 5.05705443957 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62358717085 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 8.01002369416 2.79657885939 286% => Word_Length_SD is high.
Unique words: 248.0 215.323595506 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542669584245 0.4932671777 110% => OK
syllable_count: 797.4 704.065955056 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 171.161046404 60.3974514979 283% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 158.411764706 118.986275619 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8823529412 23.4991977007 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.23529411765 5.21951772744 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136345335151 0.243740707755 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0545802014369 0.0831039109588 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0302137401377 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.079171038917 0.150359130593 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342209259326 0.0667264976115 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.8 14.1392134831 140% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 48.8420337079 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 12.1743820225 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.18 12.1639044944 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.28 8.38706741573 111% => OK
difficult_words: 126.0 100.480337079 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 33.0 11.8971910112 277% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.