Some people believe that in order to be effective, political leaders must yield to public opinion and abandon principle for the sake of compromise. Others believe that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
One of the most important issue that will occur in 2020 will be electing the next us president. some candidates estimate and predict the most favorable policy and some candidates establish the best policy for the nation based on robust, lucid faith. I have no idea who is going to be the next president, but I the latter should be the leader of us. In same logic, I support the statement that the most essential quality of an effective leader is the ability to remain consistently committed to particular principles and objectives.
Opponents argue that the political leaders must follow the public opinion because they are the representative of people. True, people voted on them based on their party and their promised policy. it is their responsibility to listen and follow what the lay people require. however, what if some supporter’s mind change after the political leader got elected? For insistance, all of supporters had jobs before the election but half of them get fired after the election. before the election, advocates totally agreed to give additional incentives to the working people. after the election, the argument arouses that the incentives should not be given. Does the leader have to give incentives to the half of the remaining working people, considering the proportion of policy’s supporters? The effective leader with faith will make a new policy, making both side satisfied.Yielding to the pubilc opinion despite of better ways is not the path of effective leader.
On the other hand, when the leader sticks to reasonable doctrine when making policy, the policy could be estimated on objective perspective. when the advocates and the opponents ask why the policy established, the leader could give long and precise explanation rather than simple answer-“because the citizen want it.” after the explanation, both sides will leave opinions-positive or negative- and based on the opinions and debates, the policy may develop in a better way. The progress of compromise could be seen as a waste of time. however it encourages each other to understand the other side and eventually leaves the product that everyone agrees.
Considering the unpredictability of the public opinion and objective observation of the policy, the most essential ability is to be based on robust faith.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 97, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...will be electing the next us president. some candidates estimate and predict the mos...
^^^^
Line 5, column 197, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
... their party and their promised policy. it is their responsibility to listen and f...
^^
Line 5, column 274, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...and follow what the lay people require. however, what if some supporter's mind cha...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 475, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Before
...f of them get fired after the election. before the election, advocates totally agreed ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 574, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: After
...ional incentives to the working people. after the election, the argument arouses that...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 880, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Yielding
... new policy, making both side satisfied.Yielding to the pubilc opinion despite of better...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 142, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: When
... be estimated on objective perspective. when the advocates and the opponents ask why...
^^^^
Line 9, column 545, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...omise could be seen as a waste of time. however it encourages each other to understand ...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 545, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: however,
...omise could be seen as a waste of time. however it encourages each other to understand ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 58.6224719101 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1970.0 2235.4752809 88% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28150134048 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06647101257 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.520107238606 0.4932671777 105% => OK
syllable_count: 637.2 704.065955056 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.38483146067 160% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.0172467052 60.3974514979 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.444444444 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7222222222 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 5.21951772744 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.303070396782 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896782062571 0.0831039109588 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758302931383 0.0758088955206 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.181068585024 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544293998668 0.0667264976115 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.