Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. Write

Essay topics:

Some people believe that in order to thrive, a society must put its own overall success before the well-being of its individual citizens. Others believe that the well-being of a society can only be measured by the general welfare of all its people. Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.

The author of the issue asserts that some believe that in order to make the overall improvement, society should prioritize public interests over individuals'. On the other hand, others emphasize the individual's advancement in terms of higher standard of living. In what follows, the main probable reason is stated and then my opinion is delineated.
Firstly, it is argued by some that achieving general benefits should be paid attention by foremost. This assertion is underscored by some societal arguments, which state that there would always be more potential benefits considering whole people rather than the minority of people. Thus, more people are more likely to an advantage of the final shortcoming. Furthermore, law legislation is to overlook probable disadvantages when they make conclusive decisions. Recent stringent laws in impeding of importing automobile made by foreign companies is a clear example, in that, it might lead higher amount of sale for interior cars and more employment which, in turn, could improve the economic situation. As a word, society included typical people, should be prepared to scarify their own peace and well-being if county lies in a crucial situation, such as war, famine, disaster and so forth.
At the same time, some claim that it is the most important duty for government to provide higher facilities for their own citizens, which means that authorities should disregard well-being status of citizens, even in critical occasions. The supporters assert that each society tends to conform variety of issue which should be addressed, which might be short-term or even long-term, however, one of the most eminent indicators of the developed country is the high level of standard of living. There should be felt that majority of citizens are still in the standard welfare and governments provide them with essential and basic need, including shelters, security, healthy foods as well as serene.
On balance, I should say that I lodge myself between two positions. In fact, what is missing on both side of the argument is a successful society should consider long-lasting results in each specific decision. If individual indulge in, for instance, owing luxury stuff and facilities they could not expect increasing growth of their own society amongst developed countries. However, governments need to consider general welfare of their citizens as they are the basic factors for any improvement. In other words, People should lead the happy and healthy life in order to merit consensus interests, otherwise, they always engaged in personal needs and they cannot bear the heavy burden of insecurity and unhealthy life.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 199, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...On the other hand, others emphasize the individuals advancement in terms of higher standard...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 296, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ving. In what follows, the main probable reason is stated and then my opinion is ...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, so, still, then, thus, well, for instance, in fact, such as, as well as, in other words, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 33.0505617978 85% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 58.6224719101 90% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2241.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 420.0 442.535393258 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33571428571 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.77643448246 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 246.0 215.323595506 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 696.6 704.065955056 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.740449438202 135% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.38483146067 182% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.8601599925 60.3974514979 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.823529412 118.986275619 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7058823529 23.4991977007 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.05882352941 5.21951772744 174% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241451583266 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0704283553925 0.0831039109588 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0571517862668 0.0758088955206 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140575787599 0.150359130593 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0349666483654 0.0667264976115 52% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 14.1392134831 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.