Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Moral values of a person are like a guiding compass when no logic is sound. According to the prompt, Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. In my opinion, I completely agree with the statement. It is quite essential that education of moral values should be the first priority of education.
Firstly, when it comes to moral values, time is of the essence. A child has a great impact on personality when subjected to moral education compared to a person who is older. For instance, A study conducted by the University of Edinburg observed that moral education taught at an age between 5-10 caused a significant change in the personality of the child who also developed several precocious emotions like empathy, guilt, etc. The same study also found that when adults (aged 18-30) were given lessons for morals they treat it like a turgid speech. The previous example shows that age can be a significant differentiator when it comes to moral education.
Secondly, moral values are essential for a person as they prevent us from doing bad, and unfair things to other people. Take a thief for instance. A thief is a person who is knowingly stealing stuff from other people. It may be the case that he is facing a financial problem but if he was taught what to do and what not to from a moral and ethical standpoint. Then He should not have done that.
In conclusion, there may have been a case when a person was not taught morality but has developed it later on. However, these cases rarely occur. Thus the best possible course of action is to teach people morality first because logic can be developed at any point of life but moral and ethical values can't.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld be the first priority of education. Firstly, when it comes to moral values, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ator when it comes to moral education. Secondly, moral values are essential for...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. Then He should not have done that. In conclusion, there may have been a cas...
^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... on. However, these cases rarely occur. Thus the best possible course of action is t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt of life but moral and ethical values cant.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69463087248 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56814910924 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8277401117 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2941176471 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302258884694 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986296065688 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119622824648 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196597458328 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108437269841 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ld be the first priority of education. Firstly, when it comes to moral values, ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ator when it comes to moral education. Secondly, moral values are essential for...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nt. Then He should not have done that. In conclusion, there may have been a cas...
^^^
Line 4, column 149, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... on. However, these cases rarely occur. Thus the best possible course of action is t...
^^^^
Line 4, column 304, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...nt of life but moral and ethical values cant.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 19.5258426966 97% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 58.6224719101 58% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1399.0 2235.4752809 63% => OK
No of words: 298.0 442.535393258 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.69463087248 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56814910924 2.79657885939 92% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526845637584 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 704.065955056 64% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.8277401117 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.2941176471 118.986275619 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5294117647 23.4991977007 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.11764705882 5.21951772744 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.302258884694 0.243740707755 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0986296065688 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.119622824648 0.0758088955206 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.196597458328 0.150359130593 131% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.108437269841 0.0667264976115 163% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.4 14.1392134831 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 48.8420337079 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 12.1743820225 71% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.63 12.1639044944 79% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.71 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 100.480337079 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.