Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Education is essential for the society to function properly because it helps raise children in a way that they can adequately function as social participants. However, it is still debatable what to teach the students in educational facilities. The most important goal for a pedagogue should be to help children learn how to logically reason because it is more beneficial for students than learning morality.

Admittedly, morality is one of the important characters that students should possess. The problem with teaching morality through an education system, however, is that it is a very subjective matter to decide what is right and wrong. Historically, it varied so widely among different societies what they considered moral and desirable. While the German society under Adolf Hitler's reign valued totalitarian morals, the current American society cherishes individualism. Sometimes, it turns out that one of the moralities that some societies has contained not adequate to a contemporary situation. Deciding which morality to promulgate is a too complex question to answer that it is better not taught in schools.

The strength of being able to logical reason is that one has an ability to decide what is right or wrong by himself/herself. In most of the mundane situations, acting right or wrong is not so palpable because the same action could be beneficial to society in one situation but not in the other. Therefore, it is bootless to teach which specific action is desirable in general. When you have enough logical reasoning skills, you can decide what is the right thing to do considering the situation by yourself.

Moreover, logical reasoning equips citizens to critically introvert the prevailing morality and ameilorate it further to help develop the society. Giving some tips to service providers is one of the traditional American cultures that other societies do not have. That has been beneficial to young part-time workers since tips helped them financially. However, some restaurant or cafe owners decided to rely only on tips to give the employees payment, which deteriorated the financial situation of the workers. This change alerted many owners with logical reasoning and they decided to deny relying only on tips and instead pay their workers set amount of salary. If the enterprise owners did not have logical reasoning skills, they could have hesitated to defy to existing cultural morality or could not even aware of the problematic situation.

Morality is definitely one of the traits that every member of a society should be aware of. However, teaching how to logically think is more beneficial to society because it has additional benefits that teaching morality could not bring.

Votes
Average: 6.6 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 433, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...ecided to rely only on tips to give the employees payment, which deteriorated the financi...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, in general

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.5258426966 118% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 33.0505617978 100% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2292.0 2235.4752809 103% => OK
No of words: 433.0 442.535393258 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29330254042 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.56165014514 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8740075241 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 215.0 215.323595506 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.496535796767 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 741.6 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.2418820276 60.3974514979 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.619047619 23.4991977007 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.19047619048 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.240643822441 0.243740707755 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0762836559061 0.0831039109588 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514184114201 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146556433292 0.150359130593 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538515634656 0.0667264976115 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 113.0 100.480337079 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.