Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Essay topics:

Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.

Education system is the first place to build the personality of a child. Hence the system should be based on strong principles of morality and logical reasoning. Because moral education is necessary to build a strong society based on ethics, whereas logical reasoning is required to produce leaders for the nation.

Moral education builds the strong sense of traditions and ethics of society, which is essential for every acclaimed personality of a nation. If the leader of a society know the very culture of a nation, religious and traditional, he would be praised more than the unaware personality. Like, Mr. Muhammad Ali Jinnah, the founder of Pakistan, knew very well all the religious and traditional tidings of the Muslims of India, was not only respected during the creation: as he was given the title og Quid-e-Azam, but he is still highly praised today. His rules and regulations are still the foundation of Pakistan. Hence, moral education is necessary to build the personality which is acclaimed by the nation for centuries.

Whereas, logical reasoning is necessary to build the leadership sense in the children. If a child is taught the practices of logical reasoning, if would help him in making decisions for the betterment of nation. Like, Allama Iqbal, the thinker of Pakistan, based on his logical reasoning abilities, decided to make a separate state for the Muslims of Pakistan, because the traditions and ethics of Hindus and Muslims were quite opposing, which created the strong walls between these two nations. Hence, logical reasoning is also required to build leadership sense in the children.

In short, there is very subtle boundary between logical reasoning and morality, and the education system should be based on this subtle boundary, neither strongly moral nor strictly logical.

Votes
Average: 5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories
Essays by the user:

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 74, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...ce to build the personality of a child. Hence the system should be based on strong pr...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 260, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...aditional, he would be praised more than the unaware personality. Like, Mr. Muh...
^^
Line 3, column 265, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...onal, he would be praised more than the unaware personality. Like, Mr. Muhammad ...
^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...claimed by the nation for centuries. Whereas, logical reasoning is necessary to buil...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 582, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...build leadership sense in the children. In short, there is very subtle boundary ...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, if, so, still, well, whereas, in short

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.3162921348 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 8.0 33.0505617978 24% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1527.0 2235.4752809 68% => OK
No of words: 292.0 442.535393258 66% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22945205479 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.55969084622 91% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73776256698 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 215.323595506 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486301369863 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 482.4 704.065955056 69% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.977784889 60.3974514979 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.461538462 118.986275619 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4615384615 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 5.21951772744 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.17456863445 0.243740707755 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739629434812 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0482498313963 0.0758088955206 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117513889913 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0286510627043 0.0667264976115 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 14.1392134831 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 48.8420337079 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 12.1743820225 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.38706741573 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.


Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.