Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
I feel that a country prospers when the politics drives in the pursuit of an ideal as well as in finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus. Capitalism might work for America where as Communalism might work of Soviet Union, it should also depend on what kind of dynamics the country is in and it’s economic policies. A country like India follows Democracy, where as countries like Germany, Nigeria, Somalia are republic countries. India follows process established by law where as America follows Due process of law. India and France enjoy powers like liberty, equality and fraternity where as some under privileged countries don’t enjoy them despite wanting to. America is fortunate to have ideas like impeachment of president, judicial review, fundamental rights which are great but might not suit the dynamics of other countries. Montesquieu’s idea of Doctrine of separation of powers in his book The Spirit of Laws, might not find a common ground in some countries. History has seen great politicians and philosophers who’ve given insights on how a society should evolve and how government works. Karl Marx in his book Das Capital claims about how communism is ideal for any country and how capitalism sits on exploiting warming classes and masses. On contrary, Adam Smith, the father of Capitalism, supports it. India too has philosophers like MN Roy who gave Radical Humanism, which isn’t appropriate all the times. Jeremy Bentham and JS Mill have propounded Utilitarianism to promote happiness and pleasure. Too many political ideas may even lead to differences in ideologies and might cause some thrift and tension in the government. These days be it in America or Britain or India, leaders are chosen based on their views either right wing or left wing. In history, theories of thinkers have served as guiding books for the advancement of civilisation. Sometimes difference in political views had even lead to wars. In the end any ideology should be in eradicating discrimination, providing equal opportunities, driving away poverty and hunger, providing good health and education and gender equality. To achieve effective governance, one might take reference from ideologies which suit their dynamics and getting on to common ground with public consensus.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 189, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...nsus. Capitalism might work for America where as Communalism might work of Soviet Union,...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: ITS_JJ_NNSNN[27]
Message: Did you mean 'its economic policies'?
Suggestion: its economic policies
... kind of dynamics the country is in and it’s economic policies. A country like India follows Democracy...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 371, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...A country like India follows Democracy, where as countries like Germany, Nigeria, Somali...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 486, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...ndia follows process established by law where as America follows Due process of law. Ind...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 599, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...s like liberty, equality and fraternity where as some under privileged countries don’t e...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 1925, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'leaded', 'led'.
Suggestion: leaded; led
... difference in political views had even lead to wars. In the end any ideology should...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, well, i feel, kind of, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 19.5258426966 41% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 58.6224719101 85% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1926.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 363.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30578512397 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85511374928 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603305785124 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 603.9 704.065955056 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7308612329 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 107.0 118.986275619 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.16666666667 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.97078651685 20% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 7.80617977528 77% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186179100183 0.243740707755 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0507328753098 0.0831039109588 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738134204851 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.186179100183 0.150359130593 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0667264976115 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 14.1392134831 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 48.8420337079 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 12.1639044944 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 100.480337079 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.