Some people claim that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal. Others argue that the goal should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
I mostly agree with the opinion in which the goal of politics should be finding common ground and reaching reasonable consensus mainly for two reasons - first one is finding common ground and reaching reasonable decision can solve a lot of complex problems in a far easier way rather than creating dispute and the second reason behind my position is in this way politics can remain unbiased in the welfare of common people not creating extreme position within the society. However I do concede with the first fact that the goal of politics should be the pursuit of an ideal if and only if that ideal is welcomed by many or not creating a hostile environment.
So the first reason behind my position is that finding common ground can help politics to solve a lot of complex problems in a easier manner without creating dispute. When politicians are actually discussing their position on a certain decision many differences are ought to appear, which can lead to row. These types of situations actually demand compromises from both sides. There has to be a middle way to find the best possible solution possible for a problem. Otherwise these differences can create a hostile environment among the politicians and getting a pragmatic solution of a particular problem will not be possible ever. So a compromise has to be made to reach a common ground. Only in this way a practical solution can be achieved which can actually serve the need of each groups and this way any complex national problems can be solved to a greater extent. That should be the goal of Politics in the first position.
The second reason behind my position is Politics remains unbiased when it is actually serving the purpose of each opinion to some extent to reach a common ground. If the main goal of politics is to pursuit of an ideal, that ideal always can not show best possible result for everybody or every nation. But if politics takes into account everyone's opinion and then reaches to a conclusion remembering everyone's purposes in this way it can serve greater good for all the people in the community and politicians as well and there can not be rise of any extremist groups which can lead to a healthy environment for the politicians as well as the common people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 474, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ng extreme position within the society. However I do concede with the first fact that t...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s to solve a lot of complex problems in a easier manner without creating dispute....
^
Line 3, column 466, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Otherwise,
...ssible solution possible for a problem. Otherwise these differences can create a hostile ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 246, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'show the best'.
Suggestion: show the best
... of an ideal, that ideal always can not show best possible result for everybody or every ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, second, so, then, well, as to, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 12.4196629213 145% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 33.0505617978 57% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 58.6224719101 82% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1862.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 390.0 442.535393258 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.77435897436 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44391917772 4.55969084622 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59199559037 2.79657885939 93% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 215.323595506 77% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.425641025641 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 590.4 704.065955056 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 20.2370786517 64% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 114.327723682 60.3974514979 189% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.230769231 118.986275619 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.0 23.4991977007 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.84615384615 5.21951772744 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312211437287 0.243740707755 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13394495142 0.0831039109588 161% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0924602555596 0.0758088955206 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.250289066982 0.150359130593 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0833565775934 0.0667264976115 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.98 12.1639044944 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.08 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 100.480337079 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 11.8971910112 223% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.