Some people claim that a nation's government should preserve its wilderness areas in their natural state. Others argue that these areas should be developed for potential economic gain.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented.
The conservation of wilderness areas has been a topic much debated in recent years. The cost of preservation and potential economical gain from developing the area has been the key factors impeding such conservation efforts. However, in the most cases, the educational, research, and even potential economic value of nature reserves can offset the obvious economic losses.
First, the wilderness areas can act as nature habitats for many endangered species, which, in turn, have great research values. One of the most eminent goals of establishing nature reserves is to protect endangered species. Though the value of protecting animal and plant diversity may not be obvious at first glance, it has been shown repeatedly to be decisive in many research efforts that benefits the entire society, as diversity provide scientist with the pool of raw material to study. Just a few years ago, scientist found a potential cure for cancer from from the bark of a endangered tree, Taxus chinensis, that is only found in a few natural reserves. Had that few nature reserved been developed for economic gains and the tree driven to extinction, the cure may not have been found. Because the diversity that wilderness area strive to protect is crucial to many researches, government should try to keep its wilderness area in its natural state.
In addition to research value, natural reserves also have high educational values. Natural reserves provide the public with a chance to see animals in their natural habitats and to experience the power of nature. This kind of experience can not be replaced by a visit to the zoo, looking at photographs, or reading about the nature in textbooks. The natural reserves are a crucial part of education for kids and adults alike can learn things unavailable elsewhere by visiting the wilderness area. This educational value should justify government’s efforts to preserve wilderness areas.
Admittedly, there are times when preserving wilderness areas in their natural states are simply unreasonable. For example, when a nation’s people are starving and struggling on the poverty line, the wilderness area could be bettered served the nation better if it is developed and used for crop production, compared to protected to its research and education value. The decision of preserving the wilderness may not be the best course of action in all cases.
In conclusion, the decision of whether to preserve or to develop a wilderness area should be made holistically and based on the country’s condition. Granted, there are certain cases where the best course of action is to develop the wilderness rather than preserve it, in most cases, the research and education value of keeping the wilderness in its natural state outweigh the potential economic gain of developing the wilderness.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 559, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...ntist found a potential cure for cancer from from the bark of a endangered tree, Taxus ch...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 581, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...l cure for cancer from from the bark of a endangered tree, Taxus chinensis, that ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'for example', 'in addition', 'in conclusion', 'kind of', 'in all cases', 'in most cases']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.26862745098 0.240241500013 112% => OK
Verbs: 0.154901960784 0.157235817809 99% => OK
Adjectives: 0.109803921569 0.0880659088768 125% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392156862745 0.0497285424764 79% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0176470588235 0.0444667217837 40% => OK
Prepositions: 0.111764705882 0.12292977631 91% => OK
Participles: 0.0666666666667 0.0406280797675 164% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.88850220281 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0333333333333 0.030933414821 108% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0960784313725 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.021568627451 0.0249443105267 86% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0137254901961 0.0148568991511 92% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2833.0 2732.02544248 104% => OK
No of words: 453.0 452.878318584 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.25386313466 6.0361032391 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.58838876751 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.412803532009 0.366273622748 113% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.317880794702 0.280924506359 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.236203090508 0.200843997647 118% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.147902869757 0.132149295362 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88850220281 2.79330140395 103% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 219.290929204 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479028697572 0.48968727796 98% => OK
Word variations: 53.8212429989 55.4138127331 97% => OK
How many sentences: 19.0 20.6194690265 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.8421052632 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6258147029 59.4972553346 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.105263158 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8421052632 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.684210526316 0.674092028746 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 55.6301847334 51.4728631049 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.11111111111 1.64882698954 128% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189471928029 0.391690518653 48% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.145045104139 0.123202303941 118% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0701581251468 0.077325440228 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564950788815 0.547984918172 103% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.145450393813 0.149214159877 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0919993588342 0.161403998019 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505583282713 0.0892212321368 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.466569100731 0.385218514788 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.065021389598 0.0692045440612 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137009997508 0.275328986314 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0279464071206 0.0653680567796 43% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.30420353982 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 3.66592920354 109% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 19.0 13.5995575221 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.