Teachers' salaries should be based on the academic performance of their students.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
Humans being are always striving for perfection because we adore and respect perfection. This is true in our professional lives as well. We are expected to deliever the best- be it at job requiring technical acumen or communication skills. The statement that teacher's salarys should be dependent on student's performance stems from our expectation of perfection and provide something to measure that kind of perfection. However, in my opinion we should not decide any teacher's salary.
No one would deny that in a poor region, people would be less educated and the children and parents won't be open to educate themselves. The parents would be too busy to inculcate the value of education in their children. This is not true for everyone, but most of them. As a result, students in poor region would struggle in school especially when it comes to learn tough subjects. It is a known fact that these schools do not perform at par with rich schools. If we make a rule to determine the salary of teachers as given in the issue statement, then teahers at schools in poor region would earn less than rich counterparts. No one would prefer to apply for teacher's job at such place and we would have incompetent teachers and not-so motivated students. This is the nightmare for any education system along with unfair difference in pay between rich schools and poor ones.
Even within a school, it can be possible that one class has more smart students than the other one. The smart ones are able to grasp concepts easily, while the other group take their time. This situation is common in schools where students learn at their own pace. A teacher teaching smart students would have less difficulty to make her students perform well, while the one teching not-so-smart might need to make some efforts. If the pay is independent of the student's performance, any teacher would be motivated to help his/her students. However, if performance comes into equation, no one would make effort to teach those not-so smart and the teacher would lose motivation to teach. Within the school, there would be difference in pay even if they work for same number of hours.
Innovation in teaching methods is important to make students ready to make contribution to their life and to their nation. If such rules in which the pay depends on student's performance, no one would try to innovate while teaching not-so-smart students. Ultimately they would lose interset and might drop out rendering our system a failure and disservice to public.
No doubt, students performance should be monitored but there should be healthy competition between teachers and students. The salary should not depend on students performance. Apart from academic performance, students should be allowed to provide feedback so that schools know how students feel about their teacher's teaching method. This would provide a healthy environment for students to learn and teachers to teach.
If the statement in the question is enforced, it would be detrimental for school's teaching environment, which would rob chance to have best education from students as well as hinder teacher's ability to do the job.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...teachers salarys should be dependent on students performance stems from our expectation ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 468, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... in my opinion we should not decide any teachers salary. No one would deny that in a p...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 476, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...pinion we should not decide any teachers salary. No one would deny that in a poo...
^^
Line 3, column 103, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e smart students than the other one. The smart ones are able to grasp concepts ea...
^^
Line 3, column 463, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...forts. If the pay is independent of the students performance, any teacher would be motiv...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 166, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
... such rules in which the pay depends on students performance, no one would try to innova...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...udents. The salary should not depend on students performance. Apart from academic perfor...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 131, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[4]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'have the best'.
Suggestion: have the best
... environment, which would rob chance to have best education from students as well as hind...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 183, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
...ucation from students as well as hinder teachers ability to do the job.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, then, well, while, apart from, kind of, no doubt, as a result, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 19.5258426966 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 27.0 12.4196629213 217% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 16.0 14.8657303371 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 65.0 58.6224719101 111% => OK
Nominalization: 30.0 12.9106741573 232% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2628.0 2235.4752809 118% => OK
No of words: 524.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01526717557 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.7844588288 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68725872924 2.79657885939 96% => OK
Unique words: 240.0 215.323595506 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.458015267176 0.4932671777 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 788.4 704.065955056 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 8.0 3.10617977528 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 28.0 20.2370786517 138% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.6645371863 60.3974514979 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.8571428571 118.986275619 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 23.4991977007 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.92857142857 5.21951772744 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 7.80617977528 115% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 17.0 10.2758426966 165% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143832050554 0.243740707755 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512643290508 0.0831039109588 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.034253707776 0.0758088955206 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0924831765742 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0295505927403 0.0667264976115 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.1639044944 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.7820224719 68% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.