Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
To encourage teachers to be more devoted in their job, some suggest that teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance. While the purpose is to better the condition of education, I don't think this is the best way to go.
Obviously, the strategy aims at forcing teachers to attend to students with their most effort, and will do the job. Frankly speaking, teachers is, after all, a job, and salary is the ultimate goal of working for most people. Through determining the salaries they get according to the grades that their students get, the policy should motivate teachers do anything they can to help students make progressions. That's probably why many parents would have tutors to aid their kids after school in private, believing that they can get professional aid from the tutor as they pay the price.
However, we should not oversee the truth that students vary in many ways, and the effort paid by the teacher is only part of the factors that affect the academic performance of students. A student with talent in literature could be poor in mathematics, and her failure in math exams doesn't mean that her math teacher is being ignorant of her. As we all know, one's interest in something is the best guide one could get. Teachers are playing an important role in helping the students learn about the world, but their effort are limited, and students rely much on themselves in choosing to be outstanding to be normal.
Besides, education is not merely focusing on academic performance. When we send our children to school, we are not only expecting them to learn to read and do the math, but also hoping that they can develop into independent person. Carrying out such policy with emphasis on grades only, may result in neglecting other abilities that students should have picked in school, like the ability to handle pressure, to communicate, and so on.
In all, basing teachers' salaries on their students' grades may seem practical at first glance, but its limits as quite clear. We should consider other ways to motivate teachers.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...to better the condition of education, I dont think this is the best way to go. ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 410, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...can to help students make progressions. Thats probably why many parents would have tu...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...hematics, and her failure in math exams doesnt mean that her math teacher is being ign...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 361, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...being ignorant of her. As we all know, ones interest in something is the best guide...
^^^^
Line 17, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ades may seem practical at first glance, but its limits as quite clear. We should...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, frankly, however, may, so, while, after all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 33.0505617978 103% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 58.6224719101 92% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1733.0 2235.4752809 78% => OK
No of words: 352.0 442.535393258 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92329545455 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33147354134 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52353174878 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5625 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 516.6 704.065955056 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 9.0 1.77640449438 507% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.6946770848 60.3974514979 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.533333333 118.986275619 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4666666667 23.4991977007 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.66666666667 5.21951772744 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.364291845373 0.243740707755 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124271807492 0.0831039109588 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129690512974 0.0758088955206 171% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220185967881 0.150359130593 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106016475058 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 14.1392134831 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 48.8420337079 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.55 12.1639044944 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.