There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts—especially at a great cost in money and jobs—to save endangered animal or plant species.
Little adjustments could lead to a big change. Necessary is that a lot of people are involved in doing so. If everyone who is part of a society realises a little change in their behaviour outcomes will be extraordinary. In case of saving endangered animal or plant species there are a lot of possibilities to change ecologic habits.
First of all, if everyone is conscious about their energy usage people are able to reduce their level. In many households, energy levels are rising to levels far above average norms. With simple changes in habits energy levels will decrease enormously, which is very positive for endangered animal or plant species because the pressure to generate energy reduces also. Examples of changing behaviour are reducing the amount of lamps which are shining, take a short shower, pull on a sweater instead of increase the temperature and using eco friendly product.
Secondly, if companies take a critical look over their business many of them will see that there are processes which could be more friendly for environment. Little change in package material, transport and electricity level could make a big difference.
Also, there are a lot of people unconscious about the results of their behaviour. People and companies have to be aware of their current behaviour to change this behaviour into more eco friendly behaviour. For example, as a company is aware about the negative effects of using a lot of paper, they could change this behaviour into a behaviour where they are going to mail instead of print or fax. As a result, if many companies decrease their usage of paper, there have to cut less trees which lead to a better living area for many species.
To conclude, people could make big differences by doing just a little bit. However, to make a difference it is necessary that the amount of participating people, companies and governments is major. So all those people have to be informed about possibilities in reducing energy levels, change certain behaviour patterns and good alternatives for products and behaviour. As a final conclusion, the translation of a Dutch proverb: ‘’ many hands make easy work’’.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 108, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...lot of people are involved in doing so. If everyone who is part of a society reali...
^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: ALSO_SENT_END[1]
Message: 'Also' is not used at the end of the sentence. Use 'as well' instead.
Suggestion: as well
...the pressure to generate energy reduces also. Examples of changing behaviour are red...
^^^^
Line 7, column 478, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun trees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...their usage of paper, there have to cut less trees which lead to a better living are...
^^^^
Line 9, column 64, Rule ID: LITTLE_BIT[1]
Message: Reduce redundancy by using 'little' or 'bit'.
Suggestion: little; bit
...ld make big differences by doing just a little bit. However, to make a difference it is ne...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1826.0 2235.4752809 82% => OK
No of words: 358.0 442.535393258 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10055865922 5.05705443957 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.55969084622 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84962752249 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.486033519553 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 704.065955056 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 6.24550561798 16% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 3.10617977528 225% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 43.4025088881 60.3974514979 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.444444444 118.986275619 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.21951772744 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111693654504 0.243740707755 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416432458761 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445275221132 0.0758088955206 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0741699856013 0.150359130593 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0400343004767 0.0667264976115 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 14.1392134831 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 48.8420337079 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 12.1639044944 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 100.480337079 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.