There is little justification for society to make extraordinary efforts — especially at a great cost in money and jobs — to save endangered animal or plant species.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Climate is changing drastically and earth is becoming day by day a bit hotter which is making lots of flaura and fauna difficult to cope up with the current enviornment. Due to which lots of species are on the verge of being extinct and endangered. But does it becomes our moral duty as human beings to save them at a heavy cost of our jobs and savings? Yes, thus I mostly disagree with the statement that it is necessary for our socitety to go out of the way and save these engangered animal and plant species even it sometimes comes the cost of money and extra efforts for which there is little justification.
If we as human beings will stop try to save these endangered species then critical moral behaviour of humanity will decrease gradually. As if we do not feel to go out of our way and comfort to save these innocent species, how can we expect humans to have the same feeling of humanity and senstivity for other humans. So as to keep that sense of being human alive we should keep putting in efforts every possible way to ensure that these endangered species can be safe, especially now in this detrimental envionrment. Also in the field of medical research, the new systems and cures are first tested with these beings likes rats, as they help us understand the behaviour of these testing specimens with these animals and eventually helps us understand the anatomy of humans even better, also help the field to grow, become better and efficient. If we don't make efforts to save these animals and plants then we limit ourselves and the possibility of human race to solve issues and diseases related to human body. As possiblity is that the cure for cancer can be found through testing of the remedies with these endangered species first, which oblige us to save them.
There are lots of reserves where the people and the government are trying to save dying species of animals in these reserves by taking proper care of them. However, suppose there is last rhino is only left and is surving on the planet. Will it be beneficial to make those extra efforts to save that species and provide all the needed resources to help it survive? According to me it will be not that beneficial to use these extraordinary money and resources to save it as there isn't any point to forcefully put efforts to help that last rhino survive as there is no chance for it to breed with another rhino to let that species to continue ahead.
Yes, still saving these endangered animal or plant species is inarguably important. As in future they will prove to be equally helpful and beneficial to us as along as we keep putting those extra efforts no matter what the circumstance and difficulties, even at the cost of our money and jobs.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: DOES_NP_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'become'?
Suggestion: become
...ing extinct and endangered. But does it becomes our moral duty as human beings to save ...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 262, Rule ID: DOES_X_HAS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'become'? As 'do' is already inflected, the verb cannot also be inflected.
Suggestion: become
...ing extinct and endangered. But does it becomes our moral duty as human beings to save ...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e feeling of humanity and senstivity for other humans. So as to keep that sense o...
^^
Line 2, column 319, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: To
...anity and senstivity for other humans. So as to keep that sense of being human alive we...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 774, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elps us understand the anatomy of humans even better, also help the field to grow...
^^
Line 2, column 853, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...row, become better and efficient. If we dont make efforts to save these animals and ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'survives'?
Suggestion: survives
...ide all the needed resources to help it survive? According to me it will be not that be...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: ACCORDING_TO_ME[1]
Message: This phrase can sound awkward in English. Consider using 'in my opinion' or 'I think'.
Suggestion: In my opinion; I think
...he needed resources to help it survive? According to me it will be not that beneficial to use t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 478, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
...money and resources to save it as there isnt any point to forcefully put efforts to ...
^^^^
Line 3, column 647, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... to let that species to continue ahead. Yes, still saving these endangered anima...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, so, still, then, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 24.0 14.8657303371 161% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 33.0505617978 166% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2239.0 2235.4752809 100% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.59753593429 5.05705443957 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4730772928 2.79657885939 88% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 215.323595506 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.462012320329 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 726.3 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 6.24550561798 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 30.0 23.0359550562 130% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 70.4911341943 60.3974514979 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.9375 118.986275619 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.4375 23.4991977007 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6875 5.21951772744 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.239804142379 0.243740707755 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0958778925494 0.0831039109588 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0628797432955 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171254221301 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0655174193611 0.0667264976115 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 14.1392134831 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.49 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.99 12.1639044944 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 87.0 100.480337079 87% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.8971910112 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.0 11.2143820225 125% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.