Those who see their ideas through, regardless of doubts or criticism others may express, are the ones who tend to leave a lasting legacy.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Striving to execute an idea and see it work in it's glory is the dream of many people, including politicans, high position holding executives, entrepreneurs. According to the statement at hand, people working towards their ideas irrespective of the doubts or criticisms casted by others tend to be successful in their endeavours. Although criticisms are beneficial to point out the glaring mistakes in a plan, yet, to achieve a long-lasting legacy, one must see through their ideas regardless of other's doubts.
Criticisms from various sources are necessary to check shortcomings in an idea or fallacies in executing a plan. Doubters provide a reality check how a certain plan might affect a society. For instance, the manager of Indian cricket team excluded the captain, Sourav Ganguly, from the World Cup squad since he was above the average playing age. Criticism poured down on the manager on such a decision and India lost the first 2 matches. Giving in to the critics, Ganguly was included in the squad and India went to qualify for the Semifinals with Ganguly breaking two batting records. Therefore doubts on a plan of action is imperative for the understanding of it's significance.
However, given that a lot of criticisms and doubters sometimes fail to understand the bigger picture, staying on track towards a goal is necessary to leave a legacy. A person puts in a lot of effort and assiduous thinking on how to achieve his goals effectively. Criticisms are often distractions and although heard, should be disregarded. For instance, one of the best selling products of Apple is the MacBook Air. When Steve Jobs forst introduced the MacBook Air in 2010, people were mad that it lacked 'essential' features like a CD slot. Fast forward to 2019, almost every laptop want to make a machine as thin as the original MacBook Air but has seldom succeeded. Had Steve Jobs given in to the doubters at that time, we won't be seeing such a masterpiece and beautifully crafted product that had a huge significance in bolstering technology like getting rid of ethernet port, CD slot. We all know the legacy that Steve has created with such bold yet elegant innovations, given the amount of backlash he got from the media.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 586, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...h Ganguly breaking two batting records. Therefore doubts on a plan of action is imperativ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 12.4196629213 24% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.3162921348 53% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1850.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 373.0 442.535393258 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.95978552279 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82822890489 2.79657885939 101% => OK
Unique words: 222.0 215.323595506 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.595174262735 0.4932671777 121% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 704.065955056 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.9716755905 60.3974514979 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.823529412 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 23.4991977007 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.05882352941 5.21951772744 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141887967463 0.243740707755 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0409916753332 0.0831039109588 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0575747146067 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104920345072 0.150359130593 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0874355305347 0.0667264976115 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 14.1392134831 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.38706741573 107% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 100.480337079 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.8971910112 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.