To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The claim that in order to study the most significant characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities is too generalised to be agreed with. The generic nature of this lies in the fact that it does not consider the noteworthy impact that cities other than the major ones have on the society. This renders its line of reasoning weak and unconvincing.
First of all, most of the major cities in any country are cosmopolitan by nature. They consist of people from various backgrounds and cultures. Despite the fact that they explain a lot about the socio-political, economic and technological conditions of the society, they do not mention much about the cultural heritage which is also integral to the society as a whole. This feature can only be seen in the bucolic parts of a country rather than the major cities. In a country like India, for example, the cultural differences between an urban and well developed city like Mumbai or New Delhi and the pastoral cities of Rajasthan can be of assistance in understanding the society; Living standards of people in Mumbai are higher than those of people in cities of Rajasthan. Development of the industrial sector in Mumbai has skyrocketed in the past decade whereas country-side areas still depend primarily on government aid. Studying minor cities proves to be significantly conducive to understanding the features of society as a whole.
Second of all, the rural areas are agricultural in nature and are the backbone for all major cities in the world. Without the support form minor cities of a country, the major cities would cease to flourish. In todays' modern world, major cities do not pay attention to the historical aspects of a society that are required to understand its foundational characteristics. But a large part of history can be studied in rural cities of a country. For example, the heart of all history of India lies in the villages of Rajasthan and Gujarat. Societal incongruity caused by disputes between urban and rural areas also help in understanding the direction in which a society is headed. The most common reasons for such conflicts arise from cultural differences that define a society's character.
Therefore, while analysing the major cities is of vital importance, one absolutely needs to study the minor cities in order to have a complete understanding of the society. More transparency can been observed in the working of a society can be observed while studying the minor cities. Knowledge of rural cities is crucial for studying the heritage and cultural aspects of the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 192, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[4]
Message: Did you mean 'can be' or 'has been'?
Suggestion: can be; has been
...nding of the society. More transparency can been observed in the working of a society ca...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, still, therefore, well, whereas, while, for example, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 33.0505617978 51% => OK
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2156.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 429.0 442.535393258 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02564102564 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.55107846309 4.55969084622 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91407550662 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 215.323595506 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.463869463869 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 701.1 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.036432523 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.8 118.986275619 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.45 23.4991977007 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.95 5.21951772744 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.174084997581 0.243740707755 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0601393862262 0.0831039109588 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0520950480936 0.0758088955206 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.129830368581 0.150359130593 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0506337713196 0.0667264976115 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 14.1392134831 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 48.8420337079 103% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 100.480337079 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.