To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some believe understanding the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities. However, for one to understand a society, they must investigate further than its major cities, because cities do not account for a whole society. While, there is a plethora of rich information about a society in its cities, if one were to only study the major cities, their research would be flawed because it would fail to include demographic differences in housing outside of the cities, rural communities, and diet differences.
First, by only conducting research in the cities, it would fail to include differences in housing outside of the cities. By expanding the research to places outside of the city, one can find a wide variety in housing and see how people live in their natural habits. In cities, it is common that people live in smaller housing; such as, apartments or town houses with very little land. By expanding the research outside of the city, one will find people living in larger houses with more land.
Furthermore, by conducting research outside of the city, one would find rural areas which would show the researcher how people live with more land and animals. The characteristics of a society is very different from the city to rural areas. In the city, people lock their houses and have a fear of being robbed or hurt by other people; however, in the rural communities, people are not typically scared of other humans and their fears are based on the dangerous wildlife that they share a home with. By taking rural areas into consideration, it would affect the data collected, because one could see a difference in lifestyle by what people's fears are.
Finally, looking outside of the city, one can find differences in diets. In the city, people go to the grocery store or often buy food at a restaurant. However, in places outside of the city, people commonly cook their own meals, have gardens, and hunt. For example, one can see a difference in diet because people in rural areas typically hunt deer and eat venison, which is a meat that people rarely eat.
In Conclusion, there are reasons to support the claim that studying major cities will show you the most important characteristics of a society, however the argument is flawed because it fails to take demographic differences in housing, rural communities, and different diets into consideration. While the argument appears to be strong, it does not outweigh the facts that it neglects the differences stated above.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 407, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...which is a meat that people rarely eat. In Conclusion, there are reasons to supp...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, furthermore, however, if, look, so, while, for example, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 67.0 58.6224719101 114% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 12.9106741573 54% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2092.0 2235.4752809 94% => OK
No of words: 423.0 442.535393258 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.94562647754 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74129964018 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.437352245863 0.4932671777 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 666.9 704.065955056 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 11.0 4.38483146067 251% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 20.2370786517 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.6087060615 60.3974514979 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.058823529 118.986275619 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8823529412 23.4991977007 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.52941176471 5.21951772744 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 10.2758426966 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193433842442 0.243740707755 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0739841199918 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0906832150604 0.0758088955206 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117810280533 0.150359130593 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0861282670978 0.0667264976115 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 14.1392134831 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.73 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.63 8.38706741573 91% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 11.8971910112 126% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.