To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Characteristics of a society, definitely an important aspect to understand how people are taking things, how things are changing, how the world is reforming. Major cities in every country underscores the current social situation, indeed major population lies in major cities so it is high likely to study those cities to understand the society. Conversely major city people aren't the only ones in the country which accounts for everything, therefore studying only major cities gives spurious representation on the society. So I disagree with the statement which shouldn't be considered as a major role.
Studying only major cities doesn't provide social situations and major issues facing by the people, because cities which already got developed and has nothing to enhance will definitely not going to reveal about the negative aspects any country. To support my statement we can take for instance India, In India we have hardly 10-15 major cities which covers most of the population and which accounts for most revenue in the country. But we have thousands of the other small towns and villages which covers half of the population. Without taking half of the population into account how can we decide something about society.
By extending the previous example I would like to ask myself a question "What is meant by society?". I come with an answer as a group of people living together and making decisions about how to do things. In major cities we can see lives of independent people who doesn't have any connections but in contrast people in small towns are more united and thinks about issues they are facing and make decisions according to all of them. The statement may be valid in more developed in countries which has nothing to do with society. But in developing countries like India the statement repudiates the society of common people. If the characteristics of major cities are playing role in the society it is evident that society has nothing to do with common people which shouldn't be the case.
I conclude by saying that to understand the most important characteristics of society one must not stick to the major cities and should be accountable to entire nation not just urbane people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 346, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Conversely,
...those cities to understand the society. Conversely major city people arent the only ones i...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 375, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...e society. Conversely major city people arent the only ones in the country which acco...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 563, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... So I disagree with the statement which shouldnt be considered as a major role. Study...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 28, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...jor role. Studying only major cities doesnt provide social situations and major iss...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 275, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...can see lives of independent people who doesnt have any connections but in contrast pe...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 632, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “If” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...epudiates the society of common people. If the characteristics of major cities are...
^^
Line 5, column 773, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: shouldn't
... nothing to do with common people which shouldnt be the case. I conclude by saying th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, if, may, so, therefore, for instance, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 12.4196629213 64% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 58.6224719101 94% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1856.0 2235.4752809 83% => OK
No of words: 367.0 442.535393258 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05722070845 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.753634849 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474114441417 0.4932671777 96% => OK
syllable_count: 585.0 704.065955056 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.2134082396 60.3974514979 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.733333333 118.986275619 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4666666667 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.4 5.21951772744 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.222314556702 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0877673724353 0.0831039109588 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579698536286 0.0758088955206 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152338327424 0.150359130593 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0431864980486 0.0667264976115 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 48.8420337079 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.1639044944 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.05 8.38706741573 96% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.