To understand the most important characteristics of a society, one must study its major cities.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The major cities have individuals from every strata of the society which is why it creates a diverse environment. It is true that studying the major cities will give good information about the characteristics of a society, however ignoring the people from towns and villages would give a flawed result. Therefore, to study the important characteristics of a society, major cities as well as the small towns and villages need to be studied.
While learning about a society, people from all strata have to be considered for the study. Focusing on major cities ignores the people living non-urban lives. Therefore to understand the most important characteristics of a society, studying only the major cities will be of no use.
A society is made of people living in urban, semi-urban and rural areas. The lifestyle of these people varies significantly in quite a few aspects. An individual from a major city will probably be using a car or bike as the major mode of transportation and on the other hand someone from rustic regions will use a bicycle or will prefer to walk to his destination. This and many more examples show how the characteristic of a city and village can be distinguished making it necessary to study both for proper assessment of a society.
Cities are predominantly made up of people who are living a better life financially compared to those who live in small towns or villages. Their requirements and expectations will thus be completely different from each other. An office goer in the city who earns well will prefer an expensive mobile to use since his basic requirements from a mobile are met only by a top of the line mobile. However, for a villager from a small village a mobile that has basic functionality like calling and messaging is more than enough. This shows the variations in the basic requirements of an individual from a major city and village which diversifies the society.
Major cities, however, also have a blend of people coming from different parts of the country and thus is beneficial in giving an idea about the society as a whole without having to study every city and town in the country to analyse the society. One part of the city will have people who have been born and brought up in the city and have mannerisms and requirements characteristic to that of a typical city person. Another part will have individuals coming from nearby rural areas or even far away towns for work who have been brought up in a rural setting. These people function in a manner that is characteristic of those coming from a rustic background. This diverse crowd present in the major cities itself makes it easier to study the society as a whole.
The major cities are made up of people coming from various towns and villages which makes it a feasible to study the characteristics of a society be examining these people. But the society as whole cannot be assessed by only studying these people since people not living in cities have a lifestyle and thus characteristics that are completely different.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 162, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...ores the people living non-urban lives. Therefore to understand the most important charac...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 355, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...eristics that are completely different.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 19.5258426966 108% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 33.0505617978 70% => OK
Preposition: 74.0 58.6224719101 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2521.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 522.0 442.535393258 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82950191571 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86358933188 2.79657885939 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 215.323595506 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.394636015326 0.4932671777 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 835.2 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 20.2370786517 109% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0359550562 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.7388560104 60.3974514979 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.590909091 118.986275619 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 23.4991977007 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 5.21951772744 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.83258426966 228% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.110830704495 0.243740707755 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0484007102816 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0458536073541 0.0758088955206 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0835962825107 0.150359130593 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.037918969624 0.0667264976115 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 14.1392134831 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 48.8420337079 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.03 12.1639044944 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.53 8.38706741573 90% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 100.480337079 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.2143820225 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.