Understanding the past is of little use to those in current positions of leadership.
Detail understanding of the past events is a must do tusk for those in current positions of leadership.
Man makes error. No one in the material world is perfect. But those who are prudent learn from their mistakes. They analyze the past and find out the facts which caused them to suffer or find out the facts which provided them advantages from the others. A nation success is largely dependent on the virtue of the leader of the nation. The way he approaches to the present situation, the way he learns from the past and the way he thinks about the future are very important for the development of a nation. Even for a business firm, the success of the company depends on the leadership. So what does make a average man different from a great leader? A good leader never does the same mistake twice. In order to attain this success he analyzed the past. For example, Sheikh Mujib was a great leader of Bangladesh. People of Bangladesh still remember him for his contribution for the country. Analyzing the must he learnt that the people of Bangladesh need to gain political independence from the Pakistani ruler in order to gain economic independence. He analyzed the past which shows that British ruler ruled the people and during those years people suffered a lot. They were deprived of the basic human rights. So, he understood that people of Bangladesh will be never happy if they do not receive independence. From this thought, in the year of 1966 he proposed six points in front of the ruler of Pakistan which included the basic rights of the people. He declared war against Pakistan later in 1971 and encouraged people to join in the war. After a nine month of war they got their independence.
Again, the working methods of scientists show that past mistakes are helpful in order to gain a scientific revolution. Man now can fly because of the contribution of Wright brothers. However, their success did not come without trial and error. They at first analyzed the past science those of which failed the project. Then they tried to correct the mistakes and made their own trial. Even then they did not gain success at first. But after a lot of sufferings and learning from these sufferings they succeed at last.
However, it is true that condition of past may not be similar to the present. It may happen that what was valid in the past may not be a key to success in present situation but the general pattern of every event is same. General pattern does not change and hence past experience though may not be fully applicable but helpful to a great expect.
Analyzing about the past is a must for a good leader.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 605, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ds on the leadership. So what does make a average man different from a great lead...
^
Line 3, column 1545, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “After” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d encouraged people to join in the war. After a nine month of war they got their inde...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 264, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experience'.
Suggestion: experience
...neral pattern does not change and hence past experience though may not be fully applicable but ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, may, so, still, then, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 76.0 58.6224719101 130% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2172.0 2235.4752809 97% => OK
No of words: 466.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.66094420601 5.05705443957 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64618479453 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50387163599 2.79657885939 90% => OK
Unique words: 219.0 215.323595506 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.469957081545 0.4932671777 95% => OK
syllable_count: 657.9 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.99550561798 120% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0109245483 60.3974514979 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 70.064516129 118.986275619 59% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.0322580645 23.4991977007 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.48387096774 5.21951772744 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 16.0 10.2758426966 156% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 5.13820224719 214% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147144239522 0.243740707755 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0399599909817 0.0831039109588 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0828513208652 0.0758088955206 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.142144603348 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154104890974 0.0667264976115 231% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.0 14.1392134831 57% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 73.17 48.8420337079 150% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.8 12.1743820225 56% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.16 12.1639044944 75% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 100.480337079 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.8971910112 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.7820224719 59% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.