Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
Whether universities should force students to take a variety of courses regardless the students’ field of study or not is a controversial matter. Although some people believe that universities should not require their students to take various courses, which vary from their field of study, I disagree with this statement because not only can it increase students’ experiences but also it helps them to find decent jobs; However, it should be said that universities should pay attention to the students’ talents and interests.
First and foremost, by and large, various studies have proved that students’ requiring to take specific courses improves their experiences germane to different subjects. It could be done just by studying and learning new materials which are chosen by universities. As an illustrated case, Watson and Crick, who found the double helix structure of DNA, were physicians. After their university forced them to take Biology class, they used this opportunity to expand their knowledge, and finally, they could detect the structure of DNA. Thus, to expand students’ experiences, universities should require their students to take different courses without paying attention to their original field of study.
Another thing coming to mind to substantiate this stand is that universities’ forcing students to take various courses helps students to find decent jobs in their societies. For instance, according to UT Southwestern University’s survey which is held in the 1990s, most students attending History courses could be able to find decent job not only in their society but also in other parts of world. Furthermore, it should be said that one of the major factors affecting to this option is versing in different cultures, traditions, and languages—which helps them to expand their communication skills as much as possible. These skills help students to make new opportunities regarding to their jobs in world.
Last but not least, nevertheless, the experiences, deriving from requiring student’s to take various courses, help the students, universities should pay attention to the students’ talents and interests. Because without adequate interests or talents in specific materials, the courses will be demanding and taxing.
In a nutshell, despite some people agree with this statement that universities should not require their students to take variegated courses without paying attention to their majors or field of study, others agree with the universities’ policy. As results, it can increase the students’ chances to expand their experiences, and find decent jobs; As well as, it should be said that the universities should opt the courses based on students’ talents and interests.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 93, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'taking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: taking
...ve proved that students' requiring to take specific courses improves their experie...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 25, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'mind substantiating'.
Suggestion: mind substantiating
...eld of study. Another thing coming to mind to substantiate this stand is that universities' f...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 717, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities regarding to their jobs in world. Last but not least, nevertheless, the ex...
^^^
Line 4, column 325, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e courses will be demanding and taxing. In a nutshell, despite some people agree...
^^^
Line 5, column 478, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n students' talents and interests.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, regarding, so, thus, well, another thing, for instance, of course, as well as, by and large
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 14.8657303371 114% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 12.9106741573 62% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2364.0 2235.4752809 106% => OK
No of words: 419.0 442.535393258 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.64200477327 5.05705443957 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52432199235 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25648431713 2.79657885939 116% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.453460620525 0.4932671777 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 692.1 704.065955056 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 23.0359550562 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.7149843665 60.3974514979 124% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.6 118.986275619 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.9333333333 23.4991977007 119% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5333333333 5.21951772744 202% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.2758426966 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.408555814355 0.243740707755 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181646056972 0.0831039109588 219% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.145770991561 0.0758088955206 192% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.29986477378 0.150359130593 199% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.097026677739 0.0667264976115 145% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.1 14.1392134831 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 48.8420337079 73% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 12.1743820225 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.73 12.1639044944 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 11.2143820225 114% => OK
text_standard: 20.0 11.7820224719 170% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.