Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
The author infers that universities should require every students to take a variety or course beside their major field. However, the following essay will argue that it is plausible to disagree with the author’s statement and present following reasons to support this point of view.
Providing variety of courses can beneficial for the students’ future career. To illustrate, many companies and industries wants people who has broad perspective of variety areas. This is because creative products and immense profits produced by complex ideas. For example, agriculture industry want people who have IT skills because they applied IT technic to nourishing their plants, maintaining more easily and produce more profits. Also, company mostly want someone who have language skills due to the global trends. Similarly, combining two different area can lead global innovation. For example, Elon Musk, who is the CEO of Space-X and Tesla, and also other famous CEOs have studied two different fields and helps to create astonishing items. As mentioned above, learning variety of courses of different fields can supportive reasons for the assertion.
However, there is some difficulties of learning other fields. Students choose their major to focus on their own field but learning other fields can burden their homework and leads low GPA. Furthermore, taking more course can cause excessively high tuition. For instance, my major subjects GPA is much better than excluding the other subjects so I often failed to get a scholarship due to the low GPA of other fields and these cause me to pay more tuition fees for next semester. Therefore, student should have their own right to choose their study of field not making mandatory criterion.
In sum, although there is some beneficial factors when student learn variety fields, universities should not to force the student to learn outside the student’s field of study but give them a chance to choose what they really want and helpful.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 10, Rule ID: THERE_S_MANY[4]
Message: Did you mean 'there are some difficulties'?
Suggestion: there are some difficulties
...easons for the assertion. However, there is some difficulties of learning other fields. Students choo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, really, similarly, so, therefore, for example, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 12.4196629213 72% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 58.6224719101 55% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1691.0 2235.4752809 76% => OK
No of words: 316.0 442.535393258 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35126582278 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.55969084622 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65150407927 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 215.323595506 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.585443037975 0.4932671777 119% => OK
syllable_count: 508.5 704.065955056 72% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.3124280782 60.3974514979 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.6875 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 23.4991977007 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.6875 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.296237200793 0.243740707755 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10251518086 0.0831039109588 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.143751379742 0.0758088955206 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.213145363226 0.150359130593 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093887325663 0.0667264976115 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 14.1392134831 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 48.8420337079 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 12.1743820225 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 12.1639044944 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 83.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.