Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study.
It is true that one should be aware of all the academic disciplines to have a wider vision on true education. One should not be restricted to study a particular field if he is interested in. But it is also true that forcing somebody to learn more than what they need is also not a relevant choice. Everyone should have their own rights to choose their field of study. Basically it is left to a student to choose if they are interested in studying a subject other than what they are interested in.
Every student or a individual has his own skills to develop. If we ask a person who is interested in machines to read biology, it would be completely unfair to him. A person should have whole freedom to choose the subjects he is interested to master in. Especially in universities, where a person develops his skills in a particular field should not be forced to choose other subjects. Because , it not only diverts their attention but also hinders their interest in their favorite subjects due to the stress and tensions. A student may not even qualify in any of the subjects if they are forced to study subjects which are not related to their interest.
Every student will have a basic knowledge of all the disciplines of academics through their primary education. That is well enough for them to choose a subject or a course which they are interested in and pursue the same in Universities. Hence, basic knowledge is already given to a student which is good enough for them to have a basic idea of all the different aspects of academics. One can choose to enhance their hobbies while studying in university for example , if a person is pursuing Computer Science as a main course in University and he is also a music lover then , University can encourage him to take part in events and also give him permission to attend music classes whenever required.
It cannot be fair to ask a person who is interested in biology to take Mathematics or English also as the part of their academic. This would reduce amount of attention towards biology as well. Hence, it should always be a students choice to select multiple subjects in university. The Universities should provide a provision to choose multiple subjects as a option.
To conclude, this is a very good debatable topic. Having a basic knowledge about all the disciplines of academics is important but forcing a student to get expertise in multiple subjects is not a appropriate choice as it hinders a persons ability to learn what he is interested in. Every student should be motivated enough to choose multiple subjects. But forcing to pursue multiple fields might have adverse effects on a students mind.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 18, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...e interested in. Every student or a individual has his own skills to develo...
^
Line 4, column 394, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...forced to choose other subjects. Because , it not only diverts their attention but...
^^
Line 7, column 466, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...while studying in university for example , if a person is pursuing Computer Scienc...
^^
Line 7, column 574, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ersity and he is also a music lover then , University can encourage him to take pa...
^^
Line 10, column 168, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...c. This would reduce amount of attention towards biology as well. Hence, it shoul...
^^
Line 10, column 358, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...rovision to choose multiple subjects as a option. To conclude, this is a ver...
^
Line 10, column 368, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o choose multiple subjects as a option. To conclude, this is a very good debatab...
^^^^^
Line 12, column 195, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...t expertise in multiple subjects is not a appropriate choice as it hinders a pers...
^
Line 12, column 232, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...ot a appropriate choice as it hinders a persons ability to learn what he is interested ...
^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 365, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'pursuing'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'force' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: pursuing
...o choose multiple subjects. But forcing to pursue multiple fields might have adverse effe...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, so, then, well, while, for example, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 29.0 19.5258426966 149% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 17.0 12.4196629213 137% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 14.8657303371 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 39.0 33.0505617978 118% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2209.0 2235.4752809 99% => OK
No of words: 465.0 442.535393258 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75053763441 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.64369019777 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71627760673 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 215.323595506 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.404301075269 0.4932671777 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 724.5 704.065955056 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.9949422357 60.3974514979 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.0434782609 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2173913043 23.4991977007 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.17391304348 5.21951772744 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 7.80617977528 128% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211748792893 0.243740707755 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737896943608 0.0831039109588 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0587165337734 0.0758088955206 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.136282931151 0.150359130593 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0243635454477 0.0667264976115 37% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 14.1392134831 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.27 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.21 8.38706741573 86% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 100.480337079 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.