Universities should require students to take courses only within those fields they are interested in studying.
While the issue at hand might gain a lot of support among the students at universities, it is not practical with respect to the realities of the 21st century. An engineering student might balk at the idea of having to study economics or law, but it is really important for a student to have atleast an elementary understanding of various aspects of different fields to do well on his own in the real world.
In today's world, with the advent of technology and globalization, companies look to hire well rounded individuals instead of people having only a single skill set. There is also the fact that most of the brightest students are more inclined towards creating their own jobs instead of joining a company; after all the prospect of not being answerable to anyone is a very attractive prospect. But starting up a new company is harder than it sounds. A student needs to have knowledge of the market, his targeted customer base, the actual necessity of the product, laws regarding the sale of such items, how to advertise the product, getting sonsorships and so on. Just having an amazing technical product is not enough. For example, let us take a look at the company apple. Steve Wozniak was the actual technical brain behind the products that made apple so succesful, but without Steve Jobs's marketing ability, the company wouldn't have been able to rise to such prominence. Also, it the statement of the issue is implemented, it will make it very difficult to switch their fields later on, the issue is neglecting all those students entering university who are not sure of their predelictions. Students sometimes expect something else while taking up a field but once they enter into it, they face a completely different reality.
Agreeing with the issue is quite easy to do, because an argument can be made that students will get to study subjects that they like which will increase their skills in those particular subjects. Who wouldn't want a country filled with students who are specialists in their niche? Even experts will agree that it will reduce the number of dropouts from university, as a student interested in just journalism doesn't have to study subjects such as advanced math which they won't even use in their jobs.
But, isn't the entire point of education that we have students who are well rounded? If courses only within the fields of their interest are studied by students, then the country as a whole can not prosper. Economists will not understand the jargon of engineers, doctors won't understand the jargon of politicians and so on. Hence, I strongly feel that it is very important for a student to have atleast some basic understanding of what goes in other fields of studies even though it might not be his favorite.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 922, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...ve Jobss marketing ability, the company wouldnt have been able to rise to such prominen...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 201, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...kills in those particular subjects. Who wouldnt want a country filled with students who...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 245, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...dnt want a country filled with students who are specialists in their niche? Even expert...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 408, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...a student interested in just journalism doesnt have to study subjects such as advanced...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 6, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: isn't
... wont even use in their jobs. But, isnt the entire point of education that we h...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, look, really, regarding, so, then, well, while, after all, for example, such as, with respect to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2289.0 2235.4752809 102% => OK
No of words: 472.0 442.535393258 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84957627119 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65143797743 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536016949153 0.4932671777 109% => OK
syllable_count: 704.7 704.065955056 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.2370786517 89% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7470163911 60.3974514979 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.166666667 118.986275619 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2222222222 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 5.21951772744 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203464997748 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061236146357 0.0831039109588 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627575294688 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118779302409 0.150359130593 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0304250905361 0.0667264976115 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 48.8420337079 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 12.1743820225 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 12.1639044944 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.3 8.38706741573 99% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 100.480337079 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 11.8971910112 164% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.