As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Some people contend that when human is accessible to more knowledge, they will have the increasing amount of the inquires to the nature of things they are studying. In other word, instead of being obvious, the things are becoming arcane. However, I hold the opposite view. The knowledge can definitely help people to ascertain rationale and resolve the complexity.
To begin with, I have to concede that people get exposed to the infinite unknown as they have better understanding of something. In any fields, the knowledge is boundless and infinite. For an example, even though most of talent scientists had dedicated their life in seeking the truth, it's more likely that they did not reap any achievements in the end, which is a validate evidence for my point stated above. On the other hand, the knowledge causes more problem. In ancient, people had been interested in celestial body, such as sun, moon and stars. However, whenever the technology advanced, there were more obstacles preventing people's development. To be more specific, with the development of telescope, people observed solar system, after that the researchers found Milky Way galaxy again. In nowadays, the astronomers have found thousands of galaxies, thus the things are becoming complex.
Nevertheless, in my opinion, it is not that knowledge turns simplicity into complexity, but it provides us with a chance that we are getting closer to the nature of those things. It's a form of acquisition. Although the new type of "unknown" is such mysterious and difficult, we are actually approaching the truth. The way toward the truth must be tough, so people have to pay more effort into it. Copernicus was a scientist in fifteenth century, who questioned geocentric widely held by the public and presented the heliocentric. His contribution moved the advancement of technology and astronomic science into a large degree. Copernicus unearthed the basic nature of the orbits of celestial bodies, making the things less mysterious. In this case, the knowledge boosts human's progress.
More importantly, when people are holding a doubt toward something, getting knowledge is definitely the only way to figure out it. An example in field of biology can validate my point. Darwin is one the most famous biologist throughout human history, who presented evolution theory to give a reasonable explanation to the puzzle held by the majority that where the first human came from. Owing to his finding, people's recognition and opinion were changed totally, eliminating the vagaries that misguided people. From this case, it is Darwin's knowledge derived from hundreds of explorations in wild that help people access to the truth.
In a nutshell, knowledge can be served as a useful tool that makes things lucid to people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 364, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...p any achievements in the end, which is a validate evidence for my point stated above. On ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 796, Rule ID: IN_NOWADAYS[1]
Message: nowadays is used without 'in'. Use simply: 'nowadays'.
Suggestion: Nowadays
...searchers found Milky Way galaxy again. In nowadays, the astronomers have found thousands o...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 180, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...g closer to the nature of those things. Its a form of acquisition. Although the new...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, first, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, such as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 12.4196629213 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 33.0505617978 106% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2354.0 2235.4752809 105% => OK
No of words: 449.0 442.535393258 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24276169265 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60321845022 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89710584133 2.79657885939 104% => OK
Unique words: 252.0 215.323595506 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561247216036 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 738.0 704.065955056 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 15.0 4.38483146067 342% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 23.0359550562 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 48.4500749567 60.3974514979 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.5384615385 118.986275619 76% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2692307692 23.4991977007 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42307692308 5.21951772744 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.163188883187 0.243740707755 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0415131237691 0.0831039109588 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0375413577528 0.0758088955206 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0876464130874 0.150359130593 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0439436896515 0.0667264976115 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 14.1392134831 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 48.8420337079 111% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.1743820225 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 12.1639044944 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.38706741573 108% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 100.480337079 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 11.2143820225 78% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.