As we acquire more knowledge, things do not become more comprehensible, but more complex and mysterious.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Knowledge in any area of study cannot be acquired entirely and there is always room for wonder and mystery. Exploring these obscurities is what makes a person sagacious and estimable. Indeed, knowledge nurtures a person in becoming more adroit and prudent and not a baffled being.
The most fundamental question that strikes a person while questioning the worth of being getting inundated by knowledge is that if it were to bewilder a person then why its importance is still overstated. This overemphasis of digging deep into a subject and exploring its nuances and intricacies has been in vogue since the antediluvian times. As a result, we have benefitted from it immensely. With the lack of advanced technologies and little knowledge in science, scientists worked arduously to make remarkable discoveries. Had Einstein gotten confused in his endeavor of unraveling the laws of physics that govern the Earth, then our understanding in this area would have been incomplete. Hence, if we want to follow the path of such venerable luminaries and give rise to ground-breaking innovations, a more profound knowledge of the subject is of utmost importance.
In every educational institution in the world, an option of higher education is offered to all the students. The people who pursue such learning are guided by mentors who have explored that particular area of knowledge even more deeply. These erudite mentors and their students flood the world with innovations. The Massachusetts Institute of Technology can be used as one of the examples. From discovering Magnetic Resonance Imaging, which is become quite popular today, to conducting novel and latest researches like quantum computing, surely people working there are not confused. Putting such revolutionary ideas into play requires a glut of knowledge and skill, and it has indeed paid off. Therefore, placing a limit on the amount of knowledge a person can attain is like going against the norms of those above-mentioned highly esteemed institutions.
However, there are certain things that have baffled people and the superfluous usage of the word “why” has sometimes led to more intrigue than a better understanding. One of the best examples is questioning the existence of God. No matter how much we delve deep into the religious books, pray, or learn, the question of His existence is always debatable. Even in the world of humanities, understanding a historically significant person by gleaning on bits of information from the past sometimes gives rise to bafflement and frustration. This bafflement is also true in the world of science where certain previously established theories and principles are frequently repudiated after getting to know a subject even more profoundly and this gives rise to nonplussed scientists.
Nevertheless, a person should never stop seeking knowledge or put a limit to the quantity that can be safely imbibed since it is something unquantifiable and endless. Knowledge is what has pushed us from a good yet ignorant past to a better future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 250, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...d yet ignorant past to a better future.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, still, then, therefore, while, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 12.4196629213 48% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 14.8657303371 141% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 33.0505617978 82% => OK
Preposition: 69.0 58.6224719101 118% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2578.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 485.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31546391753 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69283662038 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10388112054 2.79657885939 111% => OK
Unique words: 271.0 215.323595506 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558762886598 0.4932671777 113% => OK
syllable_count: 816.3 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.99550561798 140% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 23.0 20.2370786517 114% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6145444862 60.3974514979 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.086956522 118.986275619 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0869565217 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.73913043478 5.21951772744 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.83258426966 145% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.08819876901 0.243740707755 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0239355359556 0.0831039109588 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0305557331055 0.0758088955206 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0490600492324 0.150359130593 33% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0278622462103 0.0667264976115 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 14.1392134831 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 48.8420337079 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 12.1743820225 104% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.1639044944 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 139.0 100.480337079 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.