We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
In the given statement, Author argues that we can learn much more from the people who has similar views like us than those who's view contradict with us. Here, the author makes a point that the person with the similar type of views like us is more easily understandable than the person who's view contradict with us but for learning some thing even the person with the opposite view is helpful. So, it can be said that the author view is biased towards the comfortable approach.
First of all, the view author gives is just about being comfortable with the views but it should be considered that the people with the opposite view also have some good discernment towards some point which can be helpful. It can not be concluded that the person having contradictory ideas will not have any thing to learn from. In fact, learning is done better done from the person having some ideas from other side as it can be helpful in analyzing the situation more properly and impartially.
Secondly, learning from the people having same idea would get cliched over time. These will hinder in the progress of the person as he/she will not get out of his thinking sphere. He/She will just get bound to the definite area or thinking zone but in today's life one should have more of knowledge than just of some way or some thinking which will be not possible by just having the people having some shared views rather someone having ideas and knowledge of the other side will be helpful in increasing our thinking process.
Moreover, to prove the above point lets take a example of a sportsperson. Most of the sportsman have different approach towards their particular game. For example, In tennis there are two great sportsman Rafael Nadal and Roger Federer, Both are excellant player in the game but one thing is contradictory between them that is Nadal is a left hander while Federer is a right hander. But, off field they are good friends and often says that they learn a lot from each other.
However, having the people of same view with us also had some advantage like a same view through out the project. Having such people around us helps in getting a congruent view towards a project and is helpful in getting some good result easily and in less time. Having some people with same views around us will increase pace but will not helpful in increasing the knowledge.
At the end, it can concluded that the people having condradictory views would benefit us in long time. As it increases our knowledge. So, the views of the author is quite bounded to a short time success which can hinder the long.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 124, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...ho has similar views like us than those whos view contradict with us. Here, the auth...
^^^^
Line 1, column 286, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: who's
...e easily understandable than the person whos view contradict with us but for learnin...
^^^^
Line 1, column 332, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'something'?
Suggestion: something
...iew contradict with us but for learning some thing even the person with the opposite view ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed towards the comfortable approach. First of all, the view author gives is j...
^^^
Line 3, column 308, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[2]
Message: Did you mean 'anything'?
Suggestion: anything
...aving contradictory ideas will not have any thing to learn from. In fact, learning is don...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tion more properly and impartially. Secondly, learning from the people havin...
^^^
Line 5, column 434, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'has'.
Suggestion: has
...having some shared views rather someone having ideas and knowledge of the other side w...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... in increasing our thinking process. Moreover, to prove the above point lets ...
^^^
Line 7, column 49, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...ver, to prove the above point lets take a example of a sportsperson. Most of the ...
^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...at they learn a lot from each other. However, having the people of same view ...
^^^
Line 9, column 93, Rule ID: THROUGH_OUT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'throughout'?
Suggestion: throughout
...lso had some advantage like a same view through out the project. Having such people around ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...helpful in increasing the knowledge. At the end, it can concluded that the pe...
^^^
Line 11, column 23, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'conclude'
Suggestion: conclude
...the knowledge. At the end, it can concluded that the people having condradictory vi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ry views would benefit us in long time. As it increases our knowledge. So, the vie...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, for example, in fact, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 12.4196629213 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 11.3162921348 106% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2149.0 2235.4752809 96% => OK
No of words: 459.0 442.535393258 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68191721133 5.05705443957 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.62863751936 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31601378663 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 215.323595506 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.424836601307 0.4932671777 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 652.5 704.065955056 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59117977528 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 6.24550561798 80% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.38483146067 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 20.2370786517 94% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 74.4732936571 60.3974514979 123% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.105263158 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1578947368 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.47368421053 5.21951772744 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 14.0 7.80617977528 179% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.2758426966 107% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251353346103 0.243740707755 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0909685166711 0.0831039109588 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744939417986 0.0758088955206 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143433627157 0.150359130593 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739334546529 0.0667264976115 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 48.8420337079 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.1 8.38706741573 85% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 100.480337079 66% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.8971910112 113% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.