The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Everyone constituting a society contributes towards the well-being of it; both the people and ruling authority. The nature of the relation between the authority and the people play a vital role in shaping the society. People keeping leaders accountable for their actions can help maintain a balance within a society.
When people question authority it makes the authority accountable and responsible. It forces people in power to make decisions keeping the benefit of public in mind. History is filled with examples where people have questioned and raised their voice against authority which has led the authority to accede to public demands. For example, when people of India began questioning british rulers and raising their voice against their unjust system they marked the beginning of the freedom struggle which further led to their independence in 1947 after years of subversion under British rule.
On the other hand, if people do not question the authority and subjugate to its rules and requirements then they allow the authority to rule in whatever way they want. It can lead to unjust laws, corrupt leaders and biased decisions which all indicate towards an unstable society. The dictatorship rule of Adolf Hitler provides a perfect example of such a society where people followed their leaders unquestioningly which led to the killing and suffering of a large number of people.
It is the responsibility of the people to question authority for the well being of the society and it is their right to get their questions answered.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 112, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...esponsible. It forces people in power to make decisions keeping the benefit of pu...
^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ich led to the killing and suffering of a large number of people. It is the responsibility of...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, then, well, for example, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 19.5258426966 26% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 12.4196629213 16% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 33.0505617978 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 58.6224719101 60% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 6.0 12.9106741573 46% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1303.0 2235.4752809 58% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 250.0 442.535393258 56% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.212 5.05705443957 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.55969084622 87% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73562862977 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 215.323595506 61% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.528 0.4932671777 107% => OK
syllable_count: 404.1 704.065955056 57% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.10617977528 97% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 20.2370786517 54% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.1532946041 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.454545455 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7272727273 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.21951772744 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 7.80617977528 26% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18383433145 0.243740707755 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0822601039043 0.0831039109588 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0517225511319 0.0758088955206 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135079046504 0.150359130593 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034599028285 0.0667264976115 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 14.1392134831 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.15 8.38706741573 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 100.480337079 70% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.