The well-being of a society is enhanced when many of its people question authority.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
The issue states that if the people in the society questions the authority about its state the enhancement can happen, but this might not always be the case.
People have the right to question the authority so the people can and should raise the concern to the authority. For example, consider a town which has multiple houses, each house has their own water supply. Authority has decided to limit the supply for the town. This will cause the people to have limited supply, but it will be beneficial in the long run. Raising the question for the abundance supply will not cause any benefit for the society.
People facing problem can raise the question about the management of the wastage water supply. People can ask the authority to purify the wastewater and again add it to the supply this will surely help the authority to tackle the problem.
Consider another example, a school has been raised the question about the education style that they have implemented. This will only lead to the problem as to improve the styles which are not proven otherwise. But in case of scientists if some scientist raised the question about the thesis presented by others it will only make the thesis strong which will be beneficial for all.
Hence raising the question for the specific problem might improve the society's well-being but the general question might not always improve.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 17, column 1, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
... which will be beneficial for all. Hence raising the question for the specific p...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, so, well, as to, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 19.5258426966 31% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.3162921348 44% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 33.0505617978 36% => OK
Preposition: 19.0 58.6224719101 32% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1157.0 2235.4752809 52% => More number of characters wanted.
No of words: 234.0 442.535393258 53% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94444444444 5.05705443957 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 4.55969084622 86% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31416076668 2.79657885939 83% => OK
Unique words: 112.0 215.323595506 52% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.478632478632 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 352.8 704.065955056 50% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 6.24550561798 32% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 20.2370786517 59% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.115568222 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 96.4166666667 118.986275619 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 23.4991977007 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.66666666667 5.21951772744 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.161235004766 0.243740707755 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687103395989 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0352568887383 0.0758088955206 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10282874677 0.150359130593 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.033210032261 0.0667264976115 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 14.1392134831 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 48.8420337079 124% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 12.1639044944 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.95 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 100.480337079 50% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.8971910112 71% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 33.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 2.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.