When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
There’s an assertion that historic buildings should give way to the development of modern society. However, I disagree with such views and strongly recommend that city planners should balance the advancement of modern society and the preservation of historical relics.
Admittedly, the area which is occupied by historic buildings in cities can be used specifically for the purpose of economic development, such as commercial buildings and factories. With such modern facilities, more job opportunities will be created to attract people to work, thereby improving their living standards. In this way, the long term prosperity of modern society can be more achievable. Also, it can benefit the preservation of historic relics, as an affluent society are more likely to invest more funds for preserving precious ancient buildings.
While it is true that modern buildings are crucial to the development of our society, it is equally important to remember that historic buildings have their own merits. For example, many ancient buildings have been developed for the purpose of tourism, which is a good way to discover the merits of such buildings. The operation of historic buildings as public attractions enable them to be self-funded or even contribute to the fiscal revenue of some cities, as tourists tend to be generous when visiting the tourist attractions. In short, some historic buildings also have the ability to make a contribution the economic development of the society if they are properly developed.
Moreover, the educational value of historic buildings should not be underestimated. For example, many primary and second school teachers will organise regular visiting to some historic buildings in order to inform them the knowledge of history. Students who have the opportunity to acquire such knowledge are able to develop their imagination from the structures of these buildings. Also, through learning the architectural styles of these buildings, professional architects could implement some sophisticated skills into the construction of modern buildings.
In conclusion, the extreme opinion that historic buildings should give way to modern buildings need to be seriously reconsidered when making the decision about whether to raze a historic building for commercial purpose, as historic relics have their own commercial and educational merits.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 273, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... purpose of tourism, which is a good way to discover the merits of such buildings...
^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'so', 'while', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion', 'in short', 'such as', 'it is true']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.231738035264 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.141057934509 0.157235817809 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.151133501259 0.0880659088768 172% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0403022670025 0.0497285424764 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0302267002519 0.0444667217837 68% => OK
Prepositions: 0.115869017632 0.12292977631 94% => OK
Participles: 0.0327455919395 0.0406280797675 81% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.06255977117 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0453400503778 0.030933414821 147% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.0016655270985 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0931989924433 0.0997080785238 93% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0251889168766 0.0249443105267 101% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0151133501259 0.0148568991511 102% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2377.0 2732.02544248 87% => OK
No of words: 359.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.62116991643 6.0361032391 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.35284910392 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.465181058496 0.366273622748 127% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.387186629526 0.280924506359 138% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.300835654596 0.200843997647 150% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.189415041783 0.132149295362 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06255977117 2.79330140395 110% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.515320334262 0.48968727796 105% => OK
Word variations: 55.0993180625 55.4138127331 99% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6194690265 73% => OK
Sentence length: 23.9333333333 23.380412469 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7747816559 59.4972553346 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.466666667 141.124799967 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9333333333 23.380412469 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.933333333333 0.674092028746 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 62.651996286 51.4728631049 122% => OK
Elegance: 1.79761904762 1.64882698954 109% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.437847903993 0.391690518653 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129682885492 0.123202303941 105% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0521763062961 0.077325440228 67% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.64314282425 0.547984918172 117% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131183011727 0.149214159877 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.207794471105 0.161403998019 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0522382912505 0.0892212321368 59% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.43328547106 0.385218514788 112% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.102759458752 0.0692045440612 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.310935928225 0.275328986314 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0215253606336 0.0653680567796 33% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88274336283 61% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 7.22455752212 166% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.70907079646 74% => OK
Total topic words: 14.0 13.5995575221 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.