The young generation should be prepared to take over the leadership of the government.
Yes, I very agree with this statement, that we should prepare our young generation or people for leadership in our government. Because we always need a new or young mindset to tackle the problems, we facing towards the development of our nation. Because there will always a time comes that we need to count on the next generation for our future. There are a lot of examples regarding this.
For Example, As we know the famous Indian cricket team captain MS DHONI, who led his team to the first world up t-20 winning team in the history of the world cricket. This was his first t20 world cup even as a captain. He was just 26 years old when he got selected for the Indian cricket team in 2006. He is selected by the previous captain of the Indian cricket team Saurav Ganguly. Who was also, a very aggressive captain or a sportsman of the India team, famous for his shirt removing scene at lords in 2003. Ms Dhoni was appointed by him after the failure of the Indian cricket team in 2003 Worldcup. When he saw him tackling the problems and handling the situation during pressure situations in a cricket match, he realised, that MS is someone who can lead the team further. After Making him the captain of the Indian cricket team, Ganguly retires from the Indian cricket team. And his decision worked as a revolution for Indian Cricket, In the next 5-6 years, MS bleak all the ICC trophies and put it into the Indian Cricket team Bank including the 2011 World Cup, which is only happened due to the phenomenal effort by Captain himself.
Ms Dhoni has all qualities as a leader, he led his team during the victories and also, defend it during the setbacks or failures of the team. He always led his team from the front. Then, after the Loss in World Up 2015, he had to give up his captaincy and give it to his fellow junior Virat Kohli, who is a terrific batsman, also the winning captain of U19 World cup Indian cricket team.
So, In Conclusion, I want to say that society should prepare their best young candidate to lead the world after the previous generation candidate. It was always the standard rule of nature. Someone has to take over the leadership after someone who led it previously. What is necessary though, that we also, need to maintain the foundation and also, contribute to it. Foundation is necessary.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, regarding, so, then, as to, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 19.5258426966 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 14.8657303371 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 33.0505617978 142% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1913.0 2235.4752809 86% => OK
No of words: 418.0 442.535393258 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.57655502392 5.05705443957 90% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.55969084622 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38818418162 2.79657885939 85% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 215.323595506 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.464114832536 0.4932671777 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 704.065955056 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.59117977528 82% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 3.10617977528 193% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 23.0359550562 82% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 57.7698930605 60.3974514979 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0952380952 118.986275619 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9047619048 23.4991977007 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61904761905 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 10.2758426966 39% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 12.0 4.83258426966 248% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0987605673254 0.243740707755 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.037005517381 0.0831039109588 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08218473852 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.099768172276 0.150359130593 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.100446610413 0.0667264976115 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.1 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 77.57 48.8420337079 159% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 12.1743820225 59% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 12.1639044944 76% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.68 8.38706741573 92% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 100.480337079 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 11.2143820225 86% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.