The chart below shows the number of trips made by children in one country in 1990 and 2010 to travel to and from school using different modes of transport.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The chart depicts the data shown for the amount of trips taken by children through a variety of modes of transportation. The above data is shown for to seperate years i.e. 1990 and 2010.
From the above data, it can be inferred that by 2010, the number of children travelling by car to and from the school had increased. But after 20 years from 1990, all the other modes of transportation has seen a severe decline as a preference by the children.
In 1990, walking was the most prominent means to travel either from the school or to it, with over 12 million children preferring to choose it. In terms of other transport, there is a similar number of children preferring to choose either bus, cycling or walking and bus simultaneously, with above 7 million students each. In terms of all the other mediums of transport, there were fewer number of kids who travelled as a car passenger, with just more that 4 million students choosing to travel by it that year.
By 2010, this trend would sway from 1990. More than 11 million students travelled to and from the school as a car passenger. The amount of kids who preferred to walk was about 6 million in this year. Only about 2 million kids preferred cycling as their means of transportation. As for choosing bus, about 5 million children used it as their means of transporation, with about 3 million preferring to both use the bus and travelling by foot.
If you look that the data closely, all the means of transportation have seen either an increment or decrement by more than a factor of two between the data shown for the 20 year gap.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 324, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ly, with above 7 million students each. In terms of all the other mediums of trans...
^^
Line 7, column 295, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to bus'
Suggestion: to bus
...eans of transportation. As for choosing bus, about 5 million children used it as th...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, look, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 33.7804878049 172% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1313.0 965.302439024 136% => OK
No of words: 286.0 196.424390244 146% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.59090909091 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 3.73543355544 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68845651357 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 129.0 106.607317073 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.451048951049 0.547539520022 82% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 369.9 283.868780488 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 10.0 3.36585365854 297% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 8.94146341463 145% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2084637883 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.0 112.824112599 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 5.23603664747 31% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.193615370718 0.215688989381 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.087490074105 0.103423049105 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557373562237 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122387020995 0.15604864568 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0707536926219 0.0819641961636 86% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.34 11.4140731707 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.77 8.06136585366 84% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.