THE CHART BELOW SHOWS THE TOTAL NUMBER OF MINUTES (IN BILLIONS) OF TELEPHONE CALLS IN THE UK, DIVIDED INTO THREE CATEGORIES, FROM 1995-2002.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The charts illustrated changes in the quantity of phone calling communications, which is measured in billions minutes. During the period starting from 1995 to 2002 in the UK. There are three different types of calls which are addressed (local calls, national and international calls and mobiles calls)
Overall, local communications recorded the highest rate compared with the other mentioned categories. Both national and mobiles calls increased dramatically over given eight years.
In terms of local calls, from 1995 to 1998, it achieved just under double amount at billions minutes comparing with national and international call. By 1999, it peaked to 90, then following three years saw a gradual decrease to reach the minimum level to just above 60.
However, despite national and international category rose slightly year after year, the mobiles calls saw a dramatically increase, which recorded more than 40 in 2002 comparing with approximately 5 in 1995.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('dramatically') instead an adjective, or a noun ('increase') instead of another adjective.
... year after year, the mobiles calls saw a dramatically increase, which recorded more than 40 in 2002 co...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 33.7804878049 80% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 823.0 965.302439024 85% => OK
No of words: 149.0 196.424390244 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52348993289 4.92477711251 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.49378814695 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90164275054 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 96.0 106.607317073 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.644295302013 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.8868570676 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.166666667 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8333333333 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.83333333333 5.23603664747 54% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170462890142 0.215688989381 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.088464886825 0.103423049105 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579514386911 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102513043948 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0607048353026 0.0819641961636 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.2329268293 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.3012195122 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 37.0 40.7170731707 91% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 150 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.