The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The pie chart shows different causes elements of land degradation around the world which are negatively correlated with a negative effect on agriculture’s productions, while the table illustrates the total proportions of the degraded land in three regions ( North America, Europe and Oceania) in the 1990s.
Overall, over-grazing and deforestation occupied the highest proportion as the causes elements comparing with the other remaining elements. Furthermore, Europe has the largest percentage of causes element which is approximately double the percentage in Oceania and just under five times the proportion in N.A.
Initially, over-grazing occurred 33 percent, while the other deforestation and over-cultivation caused 30 percent and 28% respectively. Additionally, there was seven percent affected by other elements.
Regarding the table, although Oceania recorded 13 percent in total land degraded, but there was no over-cultivation action during mentioned period. North America caused just 0.2%by deforestation and 5% as a total. Finally, the worst situation was in Europe as there was 23% a total affect which effected by deforestation, over-cultivation and over-grazing with 9.8%, 7.7% and 5.5% respectively,
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 261, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ns of the degraded land in three regions North America, Europe and Oceania in the...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, furthermore, if, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1053.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 175.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.01714285714 4.92477711251 122% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63713576256 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50390569252 2.65546596893 132% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 324.0 283.868780488 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.45097560976 131% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 94.0588178986 43.030603864 219% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.428571429 112.824112599 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 22.9334400587 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 5.23603664747 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124739307799 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0583618782399 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0677235583333 0.0843802449381 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0824258071109 0.15604864568 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0815596458383 0.0819641961636 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.2329268293 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 20.72 61.2550243902 34% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.6 10.3012195122 161% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.93 11.4140731707 157% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.93 8.06136585366 123% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 21.0 11.4329268293 184% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.0658536585 117% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.