Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can we increase its popularity?
It is true that bike riding is better than the other modes of transportation as we take the environment into account. However, it is not widely used in many countries for some reasons. This essay will examine the key reasons for this, and suggest solutions to increase the number of people riding bicycles.
To start with, there are obvious reasons why people in today’s world tend to not use bicycles often as a means of transport. Firstly, thanks to advanced science and technology, nowadays there are more convenient forms of transport than bicycle in everyday life, such as bus, train, tram and private car. Secondly, people are likely to choose easiest ways to live. This means that they do not want to consume their energy or time unnecessarily if there are other options to save these.
However, we could take steps to encourage people to use bicycles more often than now. I believe that governments have a big role in increasing its popularity. They could invest national budgets in building a better infrastructure for bike riders. In Ilsan, one of the metropolitan cities in South Korea, for example, many citizens ride bicycles to commute or to enjoy their leisure time since the city built bike lanes all along the roads. It would also be helpful to amend current regulations to support the users and buyers. If it was known as not only an eco-friendly form but also a safer and more efficient one to travel, they might feel more positive towards riding a bicycle.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that a bicycle is currently the least popular means of transportation, governments can make it more widespread by building better systems for bike users.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 341, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'choose the easiest'.
Suggestion: choose the easiest
...ate car. Secondly, people are likely to choose easiest ways to live. This means that they do n...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, it is true, to start with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91197183099 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68549807683 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 446.4 506.74238477 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5717213105 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.6428571429 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2857142857 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212971854304 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608799724271 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476426909909 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116719815554 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00472487633909 0.056905535591 8% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 12.4159519038 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.