Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport. Why is it not popular in many places? How can we increase its popularity?
From the past generation until this modern era, Using bicycle have been admitted as efficient and effective means of transportation to prevent environment. Although this is not so popular and widely used in some places. In this essay, I would illustrate the reasons why people tend not to utilize bicycles as well as demonstrate the ways which could encourage to use this transportation.
To start with, there are several causes why people avoid using cycling. Firstly, it is undeniable that making use of other transportation such as bus, subway, train and private car could save more time than riding bicycle. Individuals always want to spend time and energy efficiently. Secondly, the road or traffic systems are not suitable for bicycle users, less bicycle paths and bike parking lots. Thereby the bicycle users feel inconvenient from lack of amenities. Lastly, some people are clumsy to ride bicycle, they are not familiar to use it on busy roads or in the city. Above the reasons could bother people riding bicycle.
Nevertheless, there are still various ways to change peoples’ concept of cycling. First and foremost, government should construct several basic amenities for riders. Such a bicycle paths do not reduce commuting time only and but it also prevent accidents from riding. What is more, taking my company as a good example, they opened new shower room for labors, after this tremendous people started to use bicycle instead of using their own car. In addition, local community also have responsibility to encourage to use bicycle. Accordingly, they could offer free bicycle rental service or lessons for beginners.
Taking everything into account, without question, bicycle is the one of economically friendly means of transport, however, the number of users are increasing. From my perspective, if government invest fund to construct convenient facilities or programs for people, people are willing to use bicycle naturally.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 361, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...onstrate the ways which could encourage to use this transportation. To start with, ...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 243, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'prevents'?
Suggestion: prevents
...uce commuting time only and but it also prevent accidents from riding. What is more, ta...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 516, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'using'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'encourage' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: using
...y also have responsibility to encourage to use bicycle. Accordingly, they could offer ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 311, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e are willing to use bicycle naturally.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, still, well, in addition, such as, as well as, to start with, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 309.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.3430420712 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80695415564 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611650485437 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 524.7 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.0539759282 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7222222222 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.1666666667 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06120827912 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0711579123657 0.244688304435 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225186239873 0.084324248473 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0343473038024 0.0667982634062 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0468363536282 0.151304729494 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.024605181658 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.0946893788 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.