Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? It is more enjoyable to have a job where you work only three days a week for long hours than to have a job where you work five days a week for shorter hours. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
In present-day society, we are busy with our daily life. To be more exact, we are competing with each other to lead a good life. Consequently, each second is immensely electable to us. People are having a hard time reaching a consensus on whether working three days per week is an excellent idea or five days. A lot of folks hold the conflicting view. As far I am concerned, I believe that work for a long time within 3 days is more effective. There are a plethora of reasons that support my point of view and I would explore a few of the most important ones here.
To begin with, in this competitive world, we have to prepare ourselves by gaining various knowledge. As a result, sufficient time must need to do it and it is possible if anyone manages their time. It is obvious that it is only when he or she does job with three days per week. For example, I am a fresh graduate student. I do not excel in essential skills like Ms word, PowerPoint, etc.
For one thing, I am looking a job where I get manage my time, and thus I make my preparations. Secondly, the rest of the days, I can spend valuable time with my family. There is no doubt that family is an asset for any person. For instance, during my graduation life, I did a part-time job. The place I worked was a very far cry. So most of the time of the day, we had to stay out of my home. So, it was blessed for me that I got a part-time job, and the rest of the days I can look after my family. Having said this, however, doing job five days a week is not a good idea. Finally, given the factors I outlined above, I may reach the b conclusion that if you lead a decent life, then task for three days in a week.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, however, if, look, may, second, secondly, so, then, thus, for example, for instance, no doubt, as a result, for one thing, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 47.0 24.0651302605 195% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1344.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 329.0 315.596192385 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.08510638298 5.12529762239 80% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25891501996 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.42720725863 2.80592935109 87% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.580547112462 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 436.5 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.60771543086 81% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 5.43587174349 239% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 16.0721442886 131% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.8253379693 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 64.0 106.682146367 60% => More chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 15.6666666667 20.7667163134 75% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317224856481 0.244688304435 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853529827396 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.072180177528 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.209889179419 0.151304729494 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362246319269 0.056905535591 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 5.7 13.0946893788 44% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 81.63 50.2224549098 163% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 5.6 11.3001002004 50% => Flesch kincaid grade is low.
coleman_liau_index: 6.15 12.4159519038 50% => Coleman_liau_index is low.
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.12 8.58950901804 83% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 78.4519038076 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 6.0 10.7795591182 56% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.