Film were produced by big companies in the past, but today people are able to make a film. Do you think this trend is positive or negative?
Recent years have seen strongly impressive advancement in film-making industry that leads to the blooming of exciting movies in the global film market. The most important issue worth noticing is that almost all well-known films, at present, are the result of severe competition between huge corporations in the field of film industry and individuals who have strong interest in film-producing works. I am of the opinion that that trend will firmly have positive impact on the long-term development of film industry.
Admittedly, in the past, film-making work could be viewed as the preserve of well-established companies. The reason for that statement is that it involves in the huge amount of money needed to invest for buying modern equipment, employee and actors’ salary, marketing cost and hiring luxury scenes for making various shots. More than that, films had been considered as an extravagant entertainment just for the wealthy. By those above-mentioned causes, individuals who have much desire for filming are easily discouraged and focus on seeking better jobs for maintaining their lives healthy and sustainable over time.
In contrast with the past, nowadays, there has existed a fair competition between those corporations and individuals who are talented with professional film-making skills. To explain for that phenomenon, there are some suitable reasons that people who are interested in making simple films have more opportunity for studying filming-related essential skills through availably designed software with a reasonable cost worthy of investing. In addition, to attract the public’s attention, social media like Facebook, You tube are extremely cheap options through which, the public can enjoy individually-produced films and in some cases, if those films are potentially blockbusters, their success are a matter of time. In the long run, those movies made by special talents can be a compelling driver for huge corporations of film industry to improve themselves and give out more high-quality movies. That competition will increasingly leads to a turning point in film-making industry in the near future.
To sum up, it can affirmed firmly that the blooming of individually-produced blockbusters have become a significant factor for the extensive development of film industry through encouraging not only the production of creative blockbusters but also laying a solid foundation for younger talents in the future to pursue their dreams confidently.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 4, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[2]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: contrast,
... healthy and sustainable over time. In contrast with the past, nowadays, there has exis...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 931, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'lead'
Suggestion: lead
...ies. That competition will increasingly leads to a turning point in film-making indus...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 19, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'affirm'
Suggestion: affirm
... in the near future. To sum up, it can affirmed firmly that the blooming of individuall...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 344, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ure to pursue their dreams confidently.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, in addition, in contrast, in some cases, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 7.30460921844 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2112.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 377.0 315.596192385 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60212201592 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.4064143971 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.26616871466 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 176.041082164 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 645.3 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.2975951904 143% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 74.7095361577 49.4020404114 151% => OK
Chars per sentence: 162.461538462 106.682146367 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 20.7667163134 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.76923076923 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234041556266 0.244688304435 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0989323637962 0.084324248473 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427873918986 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.143663819801 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.063463003232 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 13.0946893788 148% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.58 50.2224549098 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 11.3001002004 140% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.79 12.4159519038 127% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 78.4519038076 141% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.1190380762 134% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.