governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There is an idea that says governments should spend more budget on railways rather than roads. While roads are an important issue in urbanism, I am personally agreed with spending more money on railways and planning to develop them in order to have better a public service. My reasons for this are as follows.
First of all, it is clear that with population increasing so fast in this era, countries need to have salient public transportation to avoid air pollution and traffic jams. Also, there should be some encouragement for people to cease using personal cars for their everyday routines. Therefore, I believe people will come along with using public vehicles only if they are in good condition and being able to provide a convenient trip. Dedicating budget on railways in necessary in order to maintain a better and popular train service.
Second of all, trains are a decent choice for people who want to visit sharing border countries, mainly because airplanes are expensive and buses are too slow. So I think it is vitally important to develop the railways between countries and anticipate an enjoyable route for all travellers to enjoy and to become more convinced to use this kind of public service even more in the future.
By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that I am totally agreed with big budgets spending on railways. I can even predict that this issue will gradually take place in the future as we are facing a lot of different kinds of pollution (for instance air, noise and etc) and growing problems everyday.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 304, Rule ID: EVERYDAY_EVERY_DAY[3]
Message: 'Everyday' is an adjective. Did you mean 'every day'?
Suggestion: every day
...air, noise and etc and growing problems everyday.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, while, for instance, i think, kind of, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1294.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88301886792 5.12529762239 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59996987687 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.611320754717 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.7184047359 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.636363636 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27272727273 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189392282926 0.244688304435 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0766955649493 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0852364060559 0.0667982634062 128% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.122257918116 0.151304729494 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.103604872931 0.056905535591 182% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.32 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.