Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
What other measures do you think might be effective?
Many people argue that soaring the cost of fossil fuel is the first priority way to decrease the traffic congestion and pollution issue. Personally, I completely agree with that view and they should be tackled by a number of effective solutions from government and individuals.
There are two main reasons why I strongly believe that the view above is completely reasonable and effective. Firstly, provided that the government officially enforce new law in increasing the price of petrol, citizens may not be affordable to consume much petrol materials. As a result, people would use public transports such as trains, subways, buses, and so on. Furthermore, this could definitely help to reduce traffic jam also the amount of carbon emission to the atmosphere. Some countries have already applied this rule successfully for a long time, for example, in Japan, people using subways regularly to work or other activities due to its convenience and reasonable cost. Secondly, by rising the cost of fossil fuel, authority is able to cut down the natural resource exploitation and save money to spend on military or education instead.
In addition, there are other several solutions to tackle this issue. The first way to solve would be using biological fuel since it is unharmed to the environment, plus, much cheaper than common fuel. For example, in Vietnam, biological fuel is twice cheaper and being widely used recently. A second measure would be limit the certain time for average and enormous vehicles on narrow roads in rush hours. Therefore, traffic jam would decrease and less do harm to natural environment.
In conclusion, increasing the fuel cost is a essential action to reduce traffic congestion also environmental problems and appropriate other solutions should be concerned to tackle this issue effectively.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 44, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...conclusion, increasing the fuel cost is a essential action to reduce traffic cong...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as, as a result
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28865979381 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84066298769 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611683848797 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2931283506 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.57142857143 7.06120827912 136% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.142737774197 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470660880205 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0360525089122 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904126585537 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0193708675663 0.056905535591 34% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.